Install
openclaw skills install @leooooooow/product-page-auditScore product detail pages on image quality, copy effectiveness, SEO, mobile layout, and trust elements with improvement priorities.
openclaw skills install @leooooooow/product-page-auditScore and diagnose your product detail pages across five critical dimensions — image quality, copywriting effectiveness, on-page SEO, mobile responsiveness, and trust signal presence — then receive a prioritized improvement roadmap that tells you exactly what to fix first for the highest conversion impact.
| Decision | Strong | Acceptable | Weak |
|---|---|---|---|
| Image count per listing | 7-9 images including lifestyle, infographic, scale reference | 5-6 images covering key angles | 1-3 generic product shots only |
| Title keyword placement | Primary keyword in first 5 words, benefit-driven | Keyword present but buried mid-title | No keyword strategy, brand-name-only title |
| Mobile image readability | Text on images readable at 375px, tap targets ≥44px | Mostly readable, minor pinch-to-zoom needed | Text unreadable, images cropped poorly on mobile |
| Trust signal density | Reviews, badges, guarantee, social proof above fold | Some trust elements but below fold | No visible trust signals on page |
| Description structure | Scannable bullets + narrative paragraph + specs table | Bullet points only or paragraph only | Wall of text with no formatting |
| SEO meta completeness | Title tag ≤60 chars, meta desc ≤155 chars, alt text on all images | Title and meta present but suboptimal length | Missing meta description or duplicate title tags |
| Price presentation | Anchored pricing with savings shown, clear per-unit cost | Price visible but no anchoring or context | Price hidden or requires clicks to reveal |
| Call-to-action clarity | Single prominent CTA above fold with contrasting color | CTA present but competing with other buttons | CTA below fold or visually indistinct |
Gather the product page URL or detailed description of all page elements. Collect information about the product category, target audience demographics, price point, and competitive landscape. Ask for current conversion rate if available to calibrate improvement priorities.
Key questions to resolve:
Evaluate every product image against category-specific best practices. Check hero image impact, lifestyle context variety, infographic clarity, scale/size reference inclusion, and mobile thumbnail readability. Score each image individually and identify gaps in the image sequence story.
Evaluation criteria:
Analyze the product title, bullet points, and description for keyword inclusion, benefit-driven language, readability score, emotional hooks, and information hierarchy. Check that copy addresses the buyer's primary objections and desired outcomes.
Evaluation criteria:
Check title tag structure, meta description optimization, image alt text completeness, heading hierarchy, schema markup presence, and internal linking. Verify URL slug optimization and canonical tag implementation.
Evaluation criteria:
Test the page layout, image rendering, tap target sizing, text readability, and load performance on mobile devices. Check that critical purchase elements (price, CTA, reviews) are accessible without excessive scrolling.
Evaluation criteria:
Evaluate the presence, placement, and effectiveness of reviews, ratings, trust badges, guarantee statements, return policy visibility, social proof counters, and authenticity markers.
Evaluation criteria:
Compile all findings into a scored report with an overall composite score (0-100) and individual dimension scores. Rank all recommendations by expected conversion impact (high/medium/low) crossed with implementation effort (easy/medium/hard) to create a prioritized action plan.
Priority matrix:
Input provided:
Audit findings:
Overall Score: 52/100 (Needs Significant Improvement)
| Dimension | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Images | 38/100 | D |
| Copy | 55/100 | C |
| SEO | 48/100 | D+ |
| Mobile | 65/100 | C+ |
| Trust | 45/100 | D |
Image Audit: Only 4 images found (benchmark: 7-9). Missing lifestyle application shot, before/after comparison, ingredient infographic, and texture close-up. Hero image has product at 60% frame fill (should be 85%+). No scale reference image included. Infographic text would be unreadable at mobile thumbnail size.
Copy Audit: Title missing key benefit language — should lead with outcome ("Brighten Dark Spots in 14 Days"). Bullets are feature-focused rather than benefit-led. Description is a single paragraph with no scannable structure. No mention of specific results or timeframes. Readability score: Grade 11 (target: Grade 6-8).
SEO Audit: Title tag is 28 characters (underutilizing available space). Meta description missing entirely. Only 1 of 4 images has alt text. No Product schema markup detected. URL slug acceptable.
Mobile Audit: Layout responsive and functional. CTA button adequately sized at 48px height. Price and add-to-cart visible above fold. Minor issue: ingredient list requires horizontal scroll on screens <375px. Load time: 2.8 seconds on 3G (acceptable).
Trust Audit: 23 reviews displayed but no review snippets on page. No trust badges present. Return policy in footer only (not near CTA). No social proof counters. No ingredient certification badges despite "clean beauty" positioning.
Priority roadmap:
Input provided:
Audit findings:
Overall Score: 61/100 (Room for Improvement)
| Dimension | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Images | 58/100 | C |
| Copy | 62/100 | C+ |
| SEO | 72/100 | B |
| Mobile | 68/100 | C+ |
| Trust | 55/100 | C |
Image Audit: 6 images present (target 7-9 for electronics). Hero image strong with product on white background. Missing: ear-fit size comparison, charging case dimension infographic, and gym/commute lifestyle shot. Image 4 infographic has text at 10pt equivalent — unreadable on mobile. Color accuracy appears inconsistent between images 1 and 3.
Copy Audit: Title well-structured with primary keyword "Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds" leading. Bullets include battery life specifics (good) but lack comparison context. Description uses A+ Content but modules are image-heavy with minimal indexable text. Missing emotional trigger language for gym/commute use cases. No mention of included accessories in bullet summary.
SEO Audit: Backend search terms properly utilized. Title within 200-char limit. Alt text auto-generated by Amazon (suboptimal but present). Indexing for 12 relevant keywords confirmed. Missing: variation keyword targeting across parent-child listings.
Mobile Audit: A+ Content modules render well on mobile. However, bullet points truncate at 3 lines requiring "Read more" tap, and primary benefit language is cut off. Video thumbnail present but auto-play disabled reduces engagement. Image zoom functions correctly.
Trust Audit: 847 reviews visible with 4.2 stars — good baseline but several unanswered negative reviews in top-10 most helpful. No "Amazon's Choice" or "Best Seller" badge. Warranty information buried in description rather than bullet points. Brand story section enabled but contains generic content.
Priority roadmap:
Auditing without knowing the platform: Amazon, Shopify, TikTok Shop, and Walmart each have different listing requirements, character limits, image specifications, and SEO mechanics. An audit that applies Amazon standards to a Shopify page (or vice versa) produces misleading recommendations. Always confirm the platform before starting.
Ignoring mobile-first evaluation: Over 70% of ecommerce browsing happens on mobile, yet auditors often evaluate desktop layouts. Check image readability, button sizing, text truncation, and above-fold content on a 375px viewport first, then desktop second.
Treating all dimensions equally: A page with perfect images but zero reviews will still underperform. Weight trust signals and copy quality higher for high-consideration purchases, and image quality higher for impulse/visual categories. Context matters.
Recommending too many changes at once: A 30-item improvement list overwhelms sellers and nothing gets done. Limit P1 recommendations to 3-5 items maximum. The priority matrix exists for a reason — use it.
Scoring without benchmarks: A score of 65/100 means nothing without context. Always benchmark against category averages and top-performing competitors in the same price range and platform.
Missing the image sequence story: Individual image quality matters less than the narrative the image set tells collectively. Images should flow: hero → lifestyle → features → specs → social proof → scale reference. Evaluate the sequence, not just individual shots.
Overlooking page speed impact: A visually perfect page that takes 5+ seconds to load on mobile loses 40%+ of visitors before they see anything. Always include load time in the mobile audit.
Ignoring price presentation psychology: How the price is displayed matters as much as the price itself. Check for anchoring (strikethrough original price), per-unit breakdown, savings callout, and payment plan options (Afterpay/Klarna). This is often the single highest-impact change.