work-critic
v1.0.0评委式批评机制。在重要工作（PPT/文档/方案/代码/申请材料）定稿前， 以评委视角主动挑刺、指出弱点、提出改进建议。 触发词：「评委审查」「请批评」「挑刺」「弱点在哪里」「哪里会被攻击」「review」
⭐ 1· 49·0 current·0 all-time
byLeo Han@leohan1
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
high confidencePurpose & Capability
The name/description (a simulated reviewer that finds weaknesses) matches the SKILL.md instructions and output format. The skill is instruction-only and does not require unrelated binaries, credentials, or filesystem paths. Note: the package/source has no homepage and an unknown owner ID, so provenance is limited but not evidence of maliciousness.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md confines the agent to asking for background and the user’s content, then producing a structured critique (severity tiers, suggested fixes, sample questions). It does not instruct the agent to read local files, access env vars, or send data to external endpoints. It does allow the agent to request contextual information from the user — which is appropriate for this purpose but means the agent will process whatever the user provides.
Install Mechanism
No install specification or code files are present (instruction-only). No downloads or package installs are required, so there is no install-time execution risk.
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables, credentials, or config paths. There is no disproportionate request for secrets or unrelated service keys.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false (default). The skill can be invoked autonomously by the agent (disable-model-invocation:false), which is the platform default; nothing in the manifest asks for permanent or elevated system presence or to modify other skills' configs.
Assessment
This skill appears internally consistent and only operates on the content you give it. Before using it, avoid pasting sensitive secrets, credentials, or personal health/legal data into the prompt. Note the skill's source/homepage is missing, so if provenance matters to you, prefer skills with a known author or repository. Also treat the critique as advisory — verify any factual claims the skill makes (citations, numbers) before acting on them.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latestvk97cwgvz06n4q819z3pwxatnz984s024
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.