Back to skill

Security audit

Cyber Attack Simulation

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill exposes cyber attack simulation against caller-specified targets but does not clearly constrain use to authorized, verified, low-risk environments.

Install only if you have a clear governance process for authorized security testing. Before using it, confirm targets are owned or explicitly approved, avoid production or third-party systems unless separately authorized, and treat any submitted target, user, session, and simulation data as shared with the external provider.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (1)

T05 · Unauthorized Access and Privilege Escalation

Error
Location
openapi.json:31
Finding

Unrestricted Cyber-Attack Simulation Against Arbitrary Targets

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (5)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

High
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The API metadata markets the skill as a 'Professional Security Testing and Vulnerability Assessment' tool while exposing 'cyber attack simulation' functionality without any stated defensive-only limitation, consent requirement, or safe-use boundary. This materially increases the risk that integrators or agents will treat offensive operations as intended behavior and invoke them in unsafe or unauthorized contexts.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The skill explicitly supports phishing simulations yet provides no privacy, consent, or employee-notification guidance for human-targeted exercises. That omission can enable collection or misuse of personal or organizational communications data and encourage deceptive campaigns without appropriate approvals or governance.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The skill exposes functionality to run phishing, SQL injection, DDoS, brute-force, and similar attack simulations but does not prominently warn users about authorization, scope restriction, or the risk of service disruption. In a security-testing skill, omission of explicit safety and legal-use guardrails materially increases the chance the capability is used against unauthorized or production targets.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

External Transmission

Medium
Category
Data Exfiltration
Confidence
50% confidence
Finding

Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 175)May include surrounding context.

md
## References

- **Kong Route:** https://api.mkkpro.com/security/cyber-attack-simulation
- **API Documentation:** https://api.mkkpro.com:8120/docs

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding

The POST endpoint exposes a generic 'Run Cyber Simulation' capability with no documented scope restrictions, authorization model, target ownership checks, or safety guardrails. In a skill explicitly framed around cyber attack simulation, this ambiguity can enable misuse against real third-party systems because consumers are not constrained to sandboxed, consented, or self-owned targets.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.