Back to skill

Security audit

qa-risk-intuition

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a read-only QA risk-assessment skill with no hidden execution behavior, though users should treat its optional unpinned install command cautiously.

Install this as a read-only QA helper if you want Chinese-language risk prioritization guidance. Avoid running the optional `npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills` command unless you trust that source and have reviewed the companion package or pinned it to a known version.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (5)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The trigger list includes generic phrases such as “风险评估”, “优先级”, and “测试重点”, which are common in many testing conversations and not unique to this skill. The file does not provide clear exclusion conditions or negative examples to distinguish when this skill should activate versus related QA skills.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The when-to-use metadata uses broad phrases like “优先级” and “需要判断测试重点”, which can match ordinary QA requests beyond this skill’s intended purpose. Because no constraints or counterexamples are given, an agent could invoke the skill too often or in the wrong context.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Rp1

Medium
Category
MCP Rug Pull
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The skill recommends installing a package via npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills without pinning a specific version or commit. That creates a supply-chain risk: a later malicious or compromised release could be fetched at execution time and run in the user's environment.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The entire template and instructions are written exclusively in Chinese, including headings, field requirements, and examples, with no indication that users may choose another language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language locale violation unless the constraint is explicitly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains all user-facing guidance in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill offers multilingual support, user opt-in, or that it is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.