Back to skill

Security audit

qa-requirement-review

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a coherent requirement-review skill with no automatic execution or persistence, though users should treat its unpinned companion install suggestion cautiously.

Install this skill if you want Chinese-oriented requirement review guidance. Be cautious with the optional companion install command: verify the source and prefer a pinned or reviewed version before running it.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The activation guidance is broad enough to trigger on many generic testing or requirement-related tasks, which can cause the agent to invoke this skill in situations the user did not explicitly request. Over-broad routing is a security and safety concern because it increases unintended prompt injection surface and may override more appropriate, narrower workflows.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

The skill metadata and instructions are written to drive Chinese-language interaction without indicating that output language should follow user preference. While not a direct code-execution issue, this can degrade transparency, cause misunderstanding of safety-critical review output, and increase the chance that users accept or act on misinterpreted findings.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Rp1

Medium
Category
MCP Rug Pull
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The skill instructs users to run npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills without pinning a specific version or integrity-checked source. That creates a supply-chain risk: future package updates or account compromise could cause different code to be fetched and executed than what was originally reviewed.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

The file title and instructions are entirely in Chinese and direct reviewers to follow the standard as written, but do not indicate that Chinese is optional or required for a justified region-specific purpose. This can constitute a language-policy violation because it implicitly fixes the skill's operating language without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.