Security audit

automotive-testcase-generator

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a disclosed automotive test-case generator that reads user-provided requirements and creates an Excel test-case file, with no hidden execution, credential use, or persistence found.

Install this if you want a Chinese-oriented automotive test-case generation workflow. Before using it, confirm where the generated Excel file will be saved and avoid feeding proprietary vehicle requirements into an agent environment you do not trust.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (6)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 94% confidence
Finding: The trigger scope is very broad and matches many generic automotive-testing terms, which can cause the skill to activate for loosely related requests or in contexts where the user did not intend testcase generation. Over-broad activation can route sensitive requirement documents or unrelated prompts into this skill, creating context confusion, incorrect outputs, and possible mishandling of proprietary vehicle, diagnostic, or safety-related information.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 90% confidence
Finding: The file’s title and core instructional text are written in Chinese and direct the reader to use this document as the knowledge base before generating test cases. There is no indication that users may choose another language or that the Chinese-only presentation is a documented, region-specific requirement, which can violate language/locale choice policy.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 88% confidence
Finding: The title and normative instructions are entirely in Chinese and state that this file is the authoritative required format to follow. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is explicitly justified, which is not stated here.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 87% confidence
Finding: The natural-language instructions and usage guidance are effectively limited to Chinese, and the file does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a language/locale policy issue.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 80% confidence
Finding: The markdown states that the skill generates an .xlsx file with a specific filename, which is a file-write operation affecting user data/storage. The surrounding text mentions prerequisites but does not include any user-facing warning or caution that the skill will create or overwrite local files.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 97% confidence
Finding: This markdown file contains user-facing natural-language instructions entirely in Chinese, including the title and output expectation, with no indication that users may choose another language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern unless the locale limitation is explicitly justified.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.