Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md - `scripts/` — Contains the Python implementation (`idea_manager.py`)
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill is a local idea-list manager whose file writes, deletes, archives, and reindexing behavior are disclosed and fit its stated purpose.
Use this if you want a local IDEAS.md manager. Be deliberate with delete, archive, archive --force, and --file; keep backups for important idea lists and avoid pointing --file at anything that is not meant to be rewritten as an ideas file.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- `scripts/` — Contains the Python implementation (`idea_manager.py`)
The README encourages invocation from broad natural-language prompts like 'show idea list', 'review ideas', or 'add new idea', which can overlap with ordinary conversation and cause unintended tool activation. Because this skill performs persistent file writes, deletes, and archival operations, ambiguous triggering increases the chance of accidental state-changing actions from casual user phrasing.
Documenting archive --force as a way to skip confirmation exposes a fully non-interactive destructive path for archiving and reindexing entries, including rewriting references and creating archive files. In an agent setting, this can enable autonomous execution of irreversible state changes without an explicit contemporaneous user confirmation, increasing the risk of unintended data loss or integrity changes.
python3 scripts/idea_manager.py archive
python3 scripts/idea_manager.py archive --archive-details
python3 scripts/idea_manager.py archive --force # skip confirmation
Moves matching entries from IDEAS.md to memory/IDEAS-Archive-YYYY-MM-DD.md, removes them from IDEAS.md, and reindexes the remaining entries sequentially (IDEA-001, IDEA-002, …). Any related_files references are updated automatically to reflect the new IDs.
The skill explicitly performs file reads and writes, including destructive operations on IDEAS.md and archive files, but does not declare any tool scope or permissions boundary. Without an allowlist or permissions metadata, the runtime may grant broader filesystem access than users expect, increasing the chance of unintended or abusive file modification.
The description uses broad, natural-language triggers like 'add new idea' or 'review ideas', which can cause the skill to activate during ordinary conversation rather than from a clearly scoped intent. Because this skill can modify and delete files, accidental activation can lead to unintended state changes or data loss.
The examples encourage triggering the skill from everyday phrasing such as 'Add a new idea...' and 'Show me the list of my ideas' without a strict activation contract. In an agent environment, that increases the risk that normal discussion is interpreted as authorization to read or rewrite user data files.
The quick reference advertises a 'without confirmation' archive mode for a destructive operation that removes completed items and reindexes IDs. In an automated agent context, easy access to a force flag can bypass a meaningful safety checkpoint and amplify accidental or unauthorized data changes.
| Delete an idea | `idea-manager delete --id IDEA-001 --decision "Replaced by LRN-20260822-001"` |
| Archive completed items (metadata only) | `idea-manager archive` |
| Archive completed items (with full details) | `idea-manager archive --archive-details` |
| Archive without confirmation | `idea-manager archive --force` |
| See summary stats | `idea-manager status` |
| Export stats as JSON | `idea-manager status --json` |
| Export as JSON | `idea-manager read --json` |
The archive workflow documents skipping the confirmation prompt for an irreversible operation in non-interactive use. Since archive both moves data and reindexes remaining entries, bypassing confirmation increases the chance of silent destructive changes, especially if the skill is triggered too broadly or chained in automation.
idea-manager archive --archive-details
idea-manager archive --force
The delete action removes an entry from IDEAS.md and immediately writes the updated file without any confirmation prompt or explicit warning about the destructive change. Although the code prints a message after deletion, there is no pre-action disclosure in the function docstring, comments, or runtime flow to warn the user before data is removed.
The archive command does more than archive completed ideas: it renumbers every remaining entry ID and rewrites references in related_files. This creates a dangerous integrity and drift issue because IDs are durable identifiers that may be referenced externally in docs, scripts, tickets, or human workflows, so archiving one item can silently break downstream references and exceed the skill’s stated behavior.
Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
archive_parser = subparsers.add_parser('archive', help='Archive completed entries, reindex remaining')
archive_parser.add_argument('--status', help='Filter by status (default: completed)')
archive_parser.add_argument('--archive-details', action='store_true', help='Include full entry details in the archive file (default: metadata only)')
archive_parser.add_argument('--force', '-f', action='store_true', help='Skip confirmation prompt')
archive_parser.set_defaults(func='archive')
# Edit command
The global --file option allows the tool to read from and write to arbitrary user-specified paths, not just IDEAS.md in the managed workspace. In an agent setting, this broadens the skill from idea management to a general file modification primitive, enabling unintended overwrite, deletion, or corruption of sensitive files if an attacker can influence arguments or prompts.
No suspicious patterns detected.