Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill is a disclosed Chinese-language academic writing workflow for journalism and communication papers, with no hidden persistence, credential access, destructive behavior, or remote execution.
Install this if you want Chinese-language support for journalism and communication paper workflows. Be aware that broad requests like general paper writing may invoke it even when another discipline-specific skill would fit better, and verify citations or research claims independently because the skill itself warns not to fabricate sources.
The metadata description includes broad invocation examples such as '帮我写论文' and related generic writing requests. In systems that route skills based on fuzzy matching, these phrases can cause the skill to activate for loosely related or unintended requests, leading to context hijacking or inappropriate workflow steering.
The applicable-scenario section lists multiple ambiguous trigger phrases like '帮我写论文' and '写文献综述' without qualification. This increases the chance of accidental invocation across broad everyday or adjacent academic-writing requests, which can misroute user intent, override a more suitable skill, and expose users to incorrect assumptions about discipline, method, or workflow.
This markdown file is entirely written in Chinese and presents its guidance only in that language, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-language audience. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The script returns Chinese-only classification values such as "新闻与传播", "待确认", and "no_input" response context without any opt-in or documented locale constraint. This is a natural-language policy concern because it forces a specific language on all users regardless of their preferred language.
The classification logic and final JSON output use Chinese-language labels throughout, including paper types and discipline names, while also mixing in English stage labels. Because the script does not provide a user language choice or clearly justify a Chinese-only scope, it violates the locale-choice requirement.
This markdown template presents all headings and prompts in Chinese and does not mention any option to choose another language. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is reportable unless the locale constraint is explicitly justified.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content exclusively in Chinese, which can constitute a language-policy issue when no user opt-in or alternative locale is provided. There is no indication in the file that the template is intentionally region-specific or that users may choose another language.
The file presents all user-facing headings and prompts exclusively in Chinese, with no indication that language can be selected or changed. This can violate a language/locale policy when skills are expected to avoid forcing a specific language absent explicit opt-in or documented regional scope.
The entire playbook is written in Chinese and presents the skill content in a single language without indicating that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy rule for natural-language constraints, this can be a locale/language restriction without explicit opt-in or justification.
No suspicious patterns detected.
