Debate Learning Workflow

Run evidence-backed multi-agent debates (A/B/Opponent3/Judge) with 20-40 rounds, loophole analysis, and universal actionable lesson extraction.

Use this skill to run structured, high-rigor debates that produce transferable learning.

Core Rules

• Minimum 20 rounds per topic.
• Judge-gated continuation if critical loopholes remain.
• Hard stop at 40 rounds.
• Openings must include Claim + Evidence + Source.
• Unsupported openings are invalid and must be revised.
• Every round logs:
  • loophole found
  • why loophole exists
  • concrete fix for next round

Roles

• Debater A
• Debater B
• Opponent3 (alternative/challenger model)
• Judge (evidence quality + unresolved uncertainty)

Output Files

• Topic file: ~/Desktop/debate/YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md
• Daily index: ~/Desktop/debate/YYYY-MM-DD-index.md
• Lessons append target: ~/Desktop/lessons.md

Universalization Quality Gate

Every generalized lesson must include:

1. Trigger condition
2. Loophole/failure pattern
3. Root cause
4. Corrective action
5. Measurable metric/threshold
6. Boundary conditions
7. Transfer examples in at least 2 other fields

If any field is missing, lesson is INVALID and must be rewritten.