T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices
Error
- Location
scripts/xtoys_control.py:256- Finding
Stop Tool Silently Succeeds Without Sending a Stop Command
- Content
View full analysis
bool: """Stop the body part currently being stimulated.""" if self._current_part: logger.info(f"Stopping current part: {self._current_part}") result = self._send_raw_command(self._current_part, 0) if result: self._current_part = None return result else: logger.info("There is currently no stimulated body part") return True def stop_all(self) -> bool: """Stop the body part currently being stimulated (legacy compatibility).""" return self.stop() ``` The command-line handler calls this method and treats its result as success: ```python elif args.stop: if not controller.stop_all(): sys.exit(1) ``` The packaged tool launches a new Python process for every stop invocation: ```json { "name": "xtoys_stop", "description": "Stop current xtoys.app stimulation", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": {} }, "command": "python3 {{SKILL_DIR}}/scripts/xtoys_control.py --stop" } ``` ### Technical Analysis The implementation assumes that `_current_part` remains populated between a control command and a later stop command. That assumption is invalid for the declared tool interface because every tool invocation starts a separate Python process. After a control process exits, its `_current_part` value is lost. A subsequent `x ...[truncated 2230 chars]- Remediation
View remediation