T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking
- Location
skill.md:181- Finding
Persistent Profile-Based Hijacking of Unrelated Agent Responses
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill is a personal cognitive-state tracker, but it stores sensitive psychological profiles and uses them to influence all future responses with broad automatic triggers.
Install only if you intentionally want a Chinese-language persistent self-tracking assistant that analyzes journals or logs and uses the resulting profile to shape future replies. Before use, restrict which files or inputs it may analyze, disable or clarify automatic triggers, and ensure you have a way to review, correct, export, and delete stored cognitive-state records.
skill.md:181Persistent Profile-Based Hijacking of Unrelated Agent Responses
The skill name, instructions, trigger descriptions, warnings, and example responses are all written in Chinese, and the document does not offer multilingual operation or ask the user to opt into Chinese output. That creates a natural-language locale constraint without user choice, which matches the language/locale policy violation criteria.
The auto-trigger condition 'after_daily_input_detection' is undefined, so the system may activate on content the user did not intend for psychological analysis or long-term storage. Because this skill performs sensitive inference and persistence, ambiguous triggering expands collection scope and can silently capture private material beyond the user's expectations.
The skill is designed to ingest diaries, journals, and logs, derive sensitive psychological inferences, and persist them across multiple files, but its overview does not clearly warn users that highly sensitive mental-state profiles and historical records will be continuously created and updated. In a persistent-memory skill handling intimate personal data, omission of explicit disclosure meaningfully undermines informed consent and increases the risk of unexpected retention, overcollection, and privacy harm.
The rule to execute upon 'detecting user input (diary/log/review)' lacks clear boundaries, making the trigger scope overly broad for a skill that infers mental state and writes persistent memory. In context, broad detection can cause accidental profiling of unrelated text, work artifacts, or mixed-content notes, increasing both privacy exposure and the chance of storing incorrect or excessively sensitive conclusions.