Back to skill

Security audit

job-analysis-law

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a coherent Chinese-language study aid for a job-analysis law chapter, with no code execution, persistence, credentials, or hidden data access.

Install this only if you want a Chinese-first study helper for U.S. federal employment-law concepts in a job-analysis textbook chapter. Treat it as educational material, not legal advice or a source for current compliance decisions; verify current EEOC/OFCCP guidance or consult counsel for real-world legal use.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (6)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is written entirely in Chinese, including headings and instructional phrasing, with no indication that language selection is optional. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is explicitly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The entire file is written in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or that the material is intentionally limited to a Chinese-language audience. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

This markdown file includes an activation-style condition: 当用户说"帮我理解这一章"时. That phrase is broad everyday language and does not define boundaries, exclusions, or a narrower context for when this skill should activate, which could cause unintended invocation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding

This reference file presents all instructional content in Chinese, which may amount to forcing a specific language without user opt-in. The file does not indicate that the skill is region-specific or that alternative language support is intentionally limited.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
82% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents the material primarily in Chinese with embedded English terminology, but it does not state that the skill is language-specific or give the user an option to choose another language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern unless the locale restriction is clearly documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding

The entire skill content is written in Chinese and does not indicate that language selection is optional or that the material is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.