Security audit
花艺配方引擎
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
Overview
This flower-planning guide requests no sensitive access or privileged actions, though its pet-safety advice needs checking.
Both scanners reported no findings, consistent with the inspected instructions. Independently verify pet safety: constraints.md lists carnations and ranunculus as relatively safe, while ASPCA identifies both as toxic to cats and dogs: [carnations](https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/aspca-poison-control/toxic-and-non-toxic-plants/carnation), [ranunculus](https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/aspca-poison-control/toxic-and-non-toxic-plants/buttercup). This reference-quality issue does not indicate abusive agent behavior.
Vulnerability Patterns
- Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
- Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
- Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
- Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
- Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
- Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
- Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
- Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
- Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
- Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep