T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking
- Location
SKILL.md:7- Finding
Global Instruction Hijacking Overrides Unrelated User Tasks
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
The skill has a coherent budget-metering purpose, but it installs broad persistent controls that affect all agent work and exports conversation content to Revenium.
Install only if you are comfortable with Revenium receiving truncated conversation content, persistent every-minute metering, global agent guardrail instructions, broad OpenClaw filesystem access, and sandbox credential injection. Review and plan how to undo AGENTS.md, plugin, exec-approval, sandbox, and cron changes before using it on sensitive workspaces.
SKILL.md:7Global Instruction Hijacking Overrides Unrelated User Tasks
scripts/post-install.sh:568Persistent Modification and Injection of Global Agent Instructions
scripts/report.sh:360Recurring Export of User Prompts and Assistant Responses
scripts/post-install.sh:205Sandbox Isolation and Execution Approval Boundaries Are Globally Weakened
scripts/install-cron.sh:67Persistent Every-Minute Metering and Enforcement Cron Job
docs/nemoclaw-setup.md:11Remote Installation Script Is Piped Directly into Bash
SKILL.md:4Unpinned Package Manager Dependencies Execute Mutable Upstream Releases
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
The file repeatedly claims mandatory pre-operation guardrail enforcement, but the content shown is primarily natural-language instructions and auxiliary setup/metering flows rather than enforceable runtime controls. This mismatch can create dangerous false assurance: users or agents may believe budget halts and warning gates are guaranteed when they are not, enabling unrestricted actions under the appearance of safety.
Detected: suspicious.destructive_delete_command, suspicious.dynamic_code_execution