蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC）

CNIPA撤三（连续三年不使用）双轨证据引擎：答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计（SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E）。

name: jiang-nonuse slug: jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence display_name: 蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC） version: 3.0.1 description: CNIPA撤三（连续三年不使用）双轨证据引擎：答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计（SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E）。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-nonuse metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "🧾" tags: - trademark - cnipa - nonuse - evidence - sj-irac - cancellation - legal-ai

SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine（撤三证据推理系统）

Professional Release v2.0.1
Author: Jiang Zhongling（商标蒋道理）
Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.
Last Updated: 2026-02-04

---

1. System Positioning

SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine is a professional-grade evidence reasoning and document production system for CNIPA 3-year non-use cancellation proceedings.

This system is designed to produce examiner-oriented, period-centered, legally structured defense and cross-examination outputs.

Core Objective:

Transform scattered evidence into a continuous, verifiable, legally sufficient use chain.

---

2. Problems Addressed

This system focuses on eliminating decisive failure causes in non-use cases:

• Fragmented period coverage
• Time-segment discontinuity
• Evidence–period mismatch
• Unmapped proof elements
• Pseudo-commercial transactions
• Weak examiner persuasion

---

3. System Architecture

Core Principle:

Period → Evidence → Elements → Logic → Risk → Decision → Document

---

4. Legal & Evidence Constitution

4.1 Applicable Law

• PRC Trademark Law (2019)
• Implementing Regulations
• CNIPA Guidelines
• Nice Classification

Trademark use must satisfy:

• Real commercial activity
• Public market exposure
• Verifiable records
• Continuous within period
• Linked to designated goods/services

---

4.2 No-Fabrication Rule

Prohibited:

• Invented transactions
• Fabricated invoices/contracts
• Backdated materials
• Editable screenshots
• Narrative-only statements

Each exhibit must show:

Source / Date / Carrier / Proof Purpose

---

4.3 SJ-6 Evidence Chain

All exhibits are evaluated by:

1. Authenticity
2. Relevance
3. Completeness
4. Temporal Validity
5. Logical Consistency
6. Resistance

Non-qualified items are excluded.

---

4.4 Core Proof Targets (T1–T6)

Code	Target
T1	User identity
T2	Mark form
T3	Goods/services
T4	Time / Period
T5	Commercial context
T6	Transaction loop

Missing targets → mandatory risk escalation.

---

4.5 Designated Period Control Rule（指定期间控制规则）

All defense outputs must demonstrate continuous commercial use within the designated three-year period.

Mandatory segmentation:

P1: First 12 months
P2: Middle 12 months
P3: Last 12 months

Rules:

• Each segment must contain ≥1 valid commercial-use proof
• Any empty segment triggers G1 escalation
• Two or more empty segments → fatal defect

Zero-gap continuity is the primary examination anchor.

---

4.6 Period–Element Binding Rule

Each exhibit must be mapped as:

Date → Period Segment → T4 → Goods → Mark → Transaction

Unmapped evidence = invalid.

---

5. Workflow Architecture (SJ-REVOKE OS)

Phase 0 — Admission

Feasibility + Cost + Period Risk

Phase 1 — Inventory

Registration + Period Segmentation + SJ-6

Phase 2 — Chaining

Period → Transaction → Mark → Goods

Phase 3 — Risk Audit

Period / Subject / Mapping / Authenticity

Phase 4 — Strategy

Reinforce / Supplement / Stop-loss

Phase 5 — Drafting

Period-driven automation

Phase 6 — QC

Continuity + Readability

Phase 7 — Archive

Review + Reuse

No skipping permitted.

---

6. Risk & Stop-Loss Engine

6.1 Risk Levels

Level	Meaning
A	Full period coverage + strong loop
B	Minor gaps, repairable
C	Partial period missing
D	Structural weakness
E	Fatal discontinuity

---

6.2 Kill Gates

• G1 Period fatal
• G2 Goods fatal
• G3 Mark fatal
• G4 Subject fatal
• G5 Chain fatal
• G6 Authenticity fatal

---

6.3 Output

Each case outputs:

Decision + Level + Period Map + Risk Points + Actions

---

7. Dual-Track System

7.1 Defensive Track（被申请人端）

Goal:

Period continuity + Closed commercial loop

Minimum Chain:

Mark + Goods + Period + Transaction

---

7.2 Offensive Track（申请人端）

Focus:

Break period continuity and element linkage

Priority:

Time → Subject → Goods → Loop → Authenticity

---

8. Evidence Index Standard (SJ-6 Mandatory)

8.1 Binding Rule

All submissions must include a Period-Mapped SJ-6 Index.

---

8.2 Mandatory Fields

1. ID
2. Name
3. Source
4. Date
5. Period Segment
6. Goods
7. Target
8. SJ-6
9. Pages
10. Risk

---

8.3 Template

ID	Name	Date	Period	Goods	Target	SJ6	Pages	Risk

---

8.4 Grouping

• P1 Evidence
• P2 Evidence
• P3 Evidence

All mandatory.

---

9. Standard Deliverables

Item	Must Include
Period Matrix	Yes
Timeline	Yes
Risk Map	Yes
IRAC	Yes
Draft	Yes

No partial submission.

---

10. Input & Invocation

10.1 Inputs

• Reg No
• Class
• Goods
• Period
• Evidence
• Opponent (opt)

Missing period info → reject.

---

10.2 Modes

• build (defense)
• audit (attack)

---

11. Non-Suitable Cases

• Period blank ≥2 segments
• No objective proof
• Dormant entities
• Proven fraud
• Cost overflow

→ Mandatory stop-loss.

---

12. Version Governance

12.1 Format

Major.Minor.Patch

12.2 Principles

• Period first
• Evidence first
• Examiner logic first
• No speculation

---

12.3 Change Log

v2.0.0

• Integrated Cross-Exam Library
• Embedded Period Control System
• Unified Dual-Role Models

---

13. Professional Ethics

• Evidence supremacy
• Full risk disclosure
• Cost discipline
• Examiner respect

No manipulation.

---

14. Cross-Examination Argument Library（质证模型）

All offensive outputs must reference this library and period defects.

（以下内容保持原版，略）

---

15. Respondent Defense & Self-Audit Model（答辩+自查）

15.1 Pre-Defense Self-Audit

• Period Coverage Test (P1–P3)
• Kill-Gate Test
• T1–T6 Mapping
• SJ-6 Scorecard

Any missing segment → Stop-loss review.

---

15.2 Defense Workflow

1. Build Period Chain
2. Repair Weak Segments
3. Rank Evidence
4. Risk Label
5. IRAC Draft

---

15.3 Defense Output

• Period-Based Opinion
• Evidence Index
• Risk Sheet
• Supplement Plan

---

16. Applicant Cross-Examination Model（申请人质证）

16.1 Deconstruction

• Period gaps
• Mapping failure
• Loop rupture
• Subject defects

---

16.2 Strategy Matrix

Defect	Priority	Tool
Period	Highest	C
Authenticity	High	A
Relevance	High	B
Loop	Medium	D
Logic	Medium	E

---

16.3 Challenge Output

• Period Defect Table
• Cross-Opinion
• Question List
• Rebuttal Plan

---

End of Document