Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Markdown-only Chinese labor-dispute guidance skill with no code execution, credential access, persistence, or hidden automation.
Use this skill as jurisdiction-specific legal information for Chinese labor-dispute scenarios. Before acting on deadlines, compensation calculations, complaints, arbitration, or litigation steps, verify the current local rules or consult a qualified professional; avoid sharing sensitive case documents unless you are comfortable with the agent processing them.
The entire skill index and usage guidance are written in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the repository is intentionally limited to a Chinese-only audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
The file’s natural-language instructions and descriptions are exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that users can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users. This can violate language/locale policy when a skill implicitly forces a specific language without user opt-in.
The manifest describes this skill as checking whether a contract is favorable when preparing to sign a labor contract, negotiating an offer, or signing a confidentiality agreement. However, the body includes extensive guidance on double wages for unsigned contracts, compelled resignation, arbitration-style evidence collection, economic compensation, and unlawful termination damages, which go beyond pre-signing review into later-stage labor dispute handling.
The trigger language is broad and conversational, which can cause the skill to activate in loosely related employment discussions without clear user intent. Over-broad activation can lead to contextually inappropriate legal guidance, increased confusion, and misrouting to this skill when another specialized skill would be safer or more accurate.
The description says to use the skill whenever a company unilaterally terminates a contract, severance talks fail, or the company withholds a separation certificate unless the user signs. These are broad scenario descriptions rather than specific invocation constraints, and the file does not provide explicit trigger phrases, exclusions, or negative examples to limit unintended activation.
The manifest description is written only in Chinese, and the rest of the skill continues in Chinese-only instructions. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is explicitly documented and justified.
This markdown skill presents all instructions and guidance only in Chinese, and nowhere indicates that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking or China-specific audience. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file uses Chinese throughout the description, headings, instructions, and examples, which effectively forces a specific language for all users. Under the policy rule, a fixed language is a violation unless the skill offers user opt-in or clearly documents that it is intended only for a Chinese-language or region-specific audience.
All user-facing instructions, triggers, and guidance are presented only in Chinese, which can amount to a language/locale policy violation when no opt-in or alternative language option is provided. The file does not state that the skill is region- or language-restricted by design, even though it appears specialized to Chinese labor-law contexts.
The document presents itself as a pre-signing checklist, yet many later sections tell users to举报、投诉、主张双倍工资、发送被迫解除通知书、计算赔偿金. Those are not merely implementation details of checking a contract; they extend the skill into dispute escalation and rights-enforcement workflows.
All user-facing content in the skill is in Chinese, and the file does not indicate that the user can select another language or that the Chinese-only presentation is an intentional, justified locale constraint. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown skill forces a specific language/locale for all users through its description and guidance, and there is no opt-in, fallback, or statement that the skill is intended only for Chinese-speaking or PRC-law contexts. Under the policy, language-specific behavior is acceptable only when the constraint is offered as a choice or clearly documented and justified.
