T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
scripts/ask.py:4- Finding
Unbounded OpenAI SDK Dependency in One-Shot Query Script
- Content
View full analysis
=3.10" # dependencies = ["openai>=1.0.0"] # /// ``` ### Technical Analysis The PEP 723 inline dependency metadata permits `uv run` to resolve and execute any future version of the `openai` package at or above version 1.0.0. The project does not provide an exact version constraint, upper version bound, committed lockfile, or package integrity hashes. As a result, the dependency code executed by the script can change without any corresponding change to the audited project. If a future package release or its distribution channel is compromised, malicious package code could execute during import or normal SDK operation. The dependency runs in the same process as the script and can therefore access the `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` environment variable and other resources available to the invoking user. This finding concerns supply-chain exposure and version drift; the reviewed project does not itself demonstrate that the current `openai` package is malicious. ### Attack Path 1. An attacker compromises a future compatible release of the `openai` package or its package-distribution path. 2. A user invokes the documented `uv run .../scripts/ask.py` command. 3. `uv` resolves the unbounded `openai>=1.0.0` requirement to the compromised release. 4. Python imports the resolved package in `scripts/ask.py`. 5. Malicious dependency code executes with the privileges of the invoking user. 6. The code can read process environment values such as `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` and potentially transmit them through available network access. ### Impact Assessment Successful exploitation could expose the DeepSeek API credential and any other environment data readable by the process. Because dependency code executes with the user's privileges, it ...[truncated 323 chars]- Remediation
View remediation
"] ``` 2. Generate and commit a lockfile when the execution and packaging workflow supports one. 3. Require package hashes or equivalent integrity verification in automated installation workflows. 4. Update the dependency only through an explicit review process that includes changelog inspection, vulnerability scanning, and regression testing. 5. Run the script with a minimal environment and only the credentials it requires. 6. Where practical, isolate execution in a restricted container or sandbox with limited filesystem and network access. ]]>
