Back to skill

Security audit

Cg Paper Writing

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a disclosed academic writing guide for 3D vision and computer graphics papers, with no code execution, persistence, or sensitive data access.

Installers should treat this as a writing-style helper, not an authority on current venue rules or paper facts. Specify the desired output language when using it, and independently verify citations, venue requirements, and recent-paper claims before submission.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (2)

Ae4

Medium
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding

Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The rule mandating Chinese academic writing without user choice can override user intent and cause unauthorized language switching, which is a prompt-scope and policy-compliance problem. In an agent setting, this can degrade reliability, produce outputs in the wrong language, and conflict with downstream workflows or accessibility needs.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.