Autonomous Decision Making
Medium
- Category
- Excessive Agency
- Confidence
- 75% confidence
- Finding
Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
- Content
md - **Where to verify 传统色名**: 中国丝绸博物馆"乾隆色谱"(reconstructed from the 乾隆 weaving-bureau dye records — 蓝八色、黄五色、红四色、紫五色、绿六色…; `chinasilkmuseum.com`); 汉典 `zdic.net` (词义 / 釉色); 故宫博物院 `dpm.org.cn`; referenced 维基百科 colour entries. **不采** 知乎 / 百度百科 / 博客. - **Gloss vs claim.** A reader-help gloss ("蜜合色≈浅黄白") is editorial — **no citation needed**. A statement *about* a colour's status or use ("石青是清代官服主色") is a **claim** — cite it, or mark 待核实. - **Widely-cited ≠ verifiable.** 清·李斗《扬州画舫录》"浅黄白色曰蜜合" is quoted everywhere for 蜜合色, but the book is **not on 维基文库** — without checking the text itself, mark 待核实. 传统色名 are fuzzy; some (e.g. 靠色) have no reliable definition — don't invent one. - **《红楼梦》fact-check examples** (worked examples, not general rules): 第五十回 reads 仇十洲《**双艳图**》, not 艳雪图; 黛玉 is **not** "通篇不写衣饰" (第八回、第四十九回 both have real outfit descriptions) — avoid absolutes. Reading a person's colour as a "code" is a *reader's interpretation* — label it (item 28). ## Repo conventions
