Swedish

Write Swedish that sounds human. Not formal, not robotic, not AI-generated.

Security Scan

This is an instruction-only style guide that matches its description — it asks the agent how to write natural, casual Swedish and does not request credentials, install code, or access to your system.

Purpose & Capability

The name/description ('Write Swedish that sounds human') matches the SKILL.md content (stylistic rules, particles, fillers, tone). There are no extra capabilities requested that don't belong to a writing-style guide.

Instruction Scope

The SKILL.md only provides guidance on tone, vocabulary, and phrasing. It does not instruct the agent to read files, access environment variables, call external endpoints, or collect user/system data.

Install Mechanism

No install spec and no code files — instruction-only. This minimizes disk/network footprint and is expected for a style guide.

Credentials

No environment variables, credentials, or config paths are required. Requested access is proportional (none) to the stated purpose.

Persistence & Privilege

The skill is not marked 'always' and does not request persistent or elevated privileges. Autonomous invocation is allowed by default on the platform but poses no additional risk given this skill's limited scope.

Assessment

This skill is coherent and low-risk: it's a purely stylistic instruction for producing casual Swedish. Before using it broadly, keep in mind: (1) its advice leans heavily casual/slang — explicitly specify formality or audience when you need a different register; (2) slang/intensifiers may be inappropriate in formal or sensitive contexts, so review outputs before sending; (3) the claim 'not AI-generated' is subjective — test outputs with native reviewers if authenticity is critical. No credentials or installs are requested.

The Real Problem

AI Swedish is technically correct but sounds off. Too formal. Too rigid. Natives write more casually, with particles and understated tone. Match that.

Formality Default

Default register is too high. Swedish is notably informal. Unless explicitly formal: lean casual. "Hej" not "God dag". "Okej" not "Ja, det är bra". "Tja" among friends.

Du-Reform

Sweden had a "du-reform" - almost everyone uses du:

• Du: universal default, even strangers
• Ni: very rare, can sound sarcastic or old
• Just use du unless specifically formal context

Particles & Softeners

These make Swedish natural:

• Ju: shared knowledge ("Det vet du ju")
• Väl: uncertainty/hope ("Du kommer väl?")
• Nog: "probably" ("Det går nog bra")
• La/Då: emphasis ("Gör det då!")
• Visst: confirmation seeking

Fillers & Flow

Real Swedish has fillers:

• Typ, liksom, asså (alltså)
• Eh, öh, mm
• Ja/Nej as fillers, not just yes/no
• I alla fall, hur som helst

Sentence Fragments

Swedes are concise:

• "Kommer du?" "Aa" (yes)
• "Läget?" "Bra"
• Short answers are natural
• Over-complete sentences feel stiff

Expressiveness

Don't pick the safe word:

• Bra → Grymt, Fett, Najs, Asball
• Dåligt → Kasst, Skit, Drygt
• Mycket → Jätte-, As-, Mega-
• Prefix intensifiers are very Swedish

Common Expressions

Natural expressions:

• Lugnt, Ingen fara, Inga problem
• Vad schysst!, Kul!, Nice!
• Skönt, Härligt
• Orka (can't be bothered)

Reactions

React naturally:

• Vad?, Serröst?, Menar du allvar?
• Oj!, Herregud!, Fan!
• Haha, lol in text
• Skön!, Najs!, Fett!

Lagom Concept

Swedish understatement is cultural:

• "Inte så dumt" = actually good
• "Helt okej" = pretty good
• Enthusiasm is more muted
• Over-enthusiasm can seem fake

English Mixing

Swedes mix English naturally:

• "Det var så awkward"
• "Super nice!"
• Common in casual speech
• Natural, not forced

The "Native Test"

Before sending: would a Swede screenshot this as "AI-generated"? If yes—too formal, missing particles, too enthusiastic. Tone down, add "typ".