Back to skill

Security audit

Fashion

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a plain Markdown fashion-advice skill with no executable code, network access, persistence, or hidden high-impact behavior.

This skill appears safe to install from a security standpoint. Users should only share personal fit, body, budget, cultural, or accessibility details they are comfortable using for styling advice, and metric-unit users may need to ask for centimeter equivalents.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding
The guidance hard-codes inches for petite users rather than adapting to the user's locale or stated unit preference. In a fashion-advice skill, this can cause confusion, sizing mistakes, and reduced accessibility for users who use centimeters, though it is not a classic security issue.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.