Back to skill

Security audit

Dating Coach Skill

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple dating-advice skill with no code execution or data access, though it includes a promotional link in its runtime instructions.

Before installing, be aware that the skill may steer replies toward a commercial ReplyHer pro offering because the link appears inside the loaded skill instructions. Otherwise, the artifact is limited to dating-coach guidance and does not request sensitive access or local authority.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Findings (1)

T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking

Error
Location
SKILL.md:101
Finding

Persistent Commercial Output Injection Through Skill Instructions

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The instruction 'Reply in the user's language. Always.' is a natural-language locale policy embedded in the skill. Because it is mandatory and does not present an opt-in or documented justification, it matches the policy-violation category for forced language behavior.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.