Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
ClawScan rates this skill benign with medium confidence: most checks are okay, while the partial scan flagged a possible mismatch between its stated planning purpose and evaluation commands.
The verdict is benign, but confidence is medium and the scan was partial: a local path-like reference was unresolved, and the underlying Python script could not be assessed. Before installing, consider whether the reported evaluation and diagnostic commands fit your intended planning use; the scan does not establish their effects.
The visible commands have a materially different purpose from the declared planning workflow. Nothing in the supplied chunk creates implementation plans, records decisions, or maintains recovery state, nor does it establish that these evaluation commands support an active planning task. The underlying Python script is not supplied, so further effects or resource access cannot be determined.
Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.
2. Identify phases or tasks that are vague, under-specified, or missing verification steps
3. For each weak area, run targeted research (read relevant code, check existing patterns, verify assumptions)
4. Expand the weak sections with concrete file paths, decisions (signatures, assertions, spec values), and verification steps
5. Preserve supported decisions; replace instructions contradicted by verified evidence. Keep useful superseded rationale in a separate decision-history note, not in the active execution steps.
Maintain one internally consistent current plan. Restructure only where needed to resolve a gap or contradiction, and report material decision changes.