T08 · Insecure Dependencies
Warning
- Location
SKILL.md:13- Finding
Unpinned and Inconsistently Declared Third-Party Dependencies
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Admet Prediction
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
Overview
This skill is a coherent ADMET screening helper, but its bundled script presents simplified toxicity and drug-safety estimates in a way that could be mistaken for validated scientific predictions.
Install only in an isolated environment with pinned, reviewed dependencies. Treat all predictions as rough early-screening estimates, not clinical, regulatory, toxicological, or definitive safety evidence; require expert review and experimental validation before acting on hERG, DILI, Ames, or drug-likeness results.
Vulnerability Patterns
- Insecure DependenciesIntroduces malicious components through unsafe dependency sources
- Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
- Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
- Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
- Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (1)
Vulnerability Patterns
- Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
- MCP Least PrivilegeUnderdeclared Capability, Wildcard Permission, Missing Permission Declaration
- Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
- Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
- Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (5)
Undeclared Tool Scope
Medium
- Category
- MCP Least Privilege
- Confidence
- 70% confidence
- Finding
Without declared permissions the skill's intent is opaque and cannot be validated.
- Content
Ae4
Medium
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 80% confidence
- Finding
Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content
- Content
Ae4
Medium
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 80% confidence
- Finding
Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content
- Content
Missing User Warnings
Medium
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 96% confidence
- Finding
The code returns ADMET and toxicity assessments such as hERG inhibition, DILI risk, Ames, bioavailability, and drug-likeness as authoritative-looking outputs, but the underlying logic is explicitly simplified heuristics and rough rules of thumb. In a drug discovery context, presenting these results without prominent warnings can mislead users into treating them as reliable safety or clinical evidence, which can cause unsafe prioritization or de-prioritization of compounds.
- Content
Missing User Warnings
Medium
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 97% confidence
- Finding
The CLI summary prints concise toxicity and ADMET conclusions like 'hERG: Yes', 'DILI: Concern', and 'Status: Pass' without any cautionary framing, which makes the output appear definitive and decision-ready. In the context of medicinal chemistry and safety screening, that presentation increases the risk of misuse by non-experts or automated workflows that may consume the output as if it were validated scientific prediction.
- Content
Static analysis
No suspicious patterns detected.