Back to skill

Security audit

Weekly SEO Health Audit

Security checks across malware telemetry and agentic risk

Overview

This is a read-only SEO audit skill that appears purpose-aligned, but users should point it only at public websites.

Use this skill for read-only audits of public websites. Before installing, confirm you are comfortable with the agent making HTTP/browser requests to the site being audited, and do not point it at localhost, intranet, private cloud, metadata-service, or authenticated pages unless your runtime blocks unsafe destinations. The skill does not make site changes; review its recommendations before acting on them.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Insecure Skill Coding PracticesFinds exploitable flaws such as hardcoded secrets or command injection
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (1)

T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices

Warning
Location
SKILL.md:11
Finding
Unrestricted Target Fetching Enables SSRF-Style Internal Network Access<![CDATA[ ## Vulnerability Details **File Location**: `SKILL.md`, lines 11–13 and 30–31 **Vulnerability Type**: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)-style unrestricted network access **Risk Level**: Medium ### Vulnerable Code ```yaml tools: - http - browser ``` ```markdown - Read-only pass: fetch `robots.txt`, the sitemap, and ~5 representative page headers (title, H1, meta description, canonical). ``` ### Technical Analysis The skill accepts a user-selected website as its audit target and directs the agent to fetch multiple resources from that target using the `http` and `browser` tools. It does not specify validation of the URL scheme, resolved IP address, hostname, port, redirects, or destination network. Consequently, a user may supply a loopback address, private-network address, link-local destination, cloud metadata endpoint, or a hostname that resolves to one of those destinations. The requests would originate from the agent's network environment rather than the user's environment. The documented “read-only” restriction prevents intentional modification of the target but does not mitigate unauthorized reading, internal service discovery, or disclosure of response content. ### Attack Path 1. An attacker requests an SEO audit of a destination such as a loopback host, RFC1918 address, link-local address, or attacker-controlled hostname that resolves to an internal address. 2. Following the skill instructions, the agent uses `http` or `browser` to request `robots.txt`, a sitemap, and representative pages. 3. If the agent can reach the destination, it receives responses from services that may not be externally accessible. 4. The skill incorporates discovered URLs, titles, headers, metadata, or crawlability details into its audit evidence. 5. The attacker obtains internal service information or content through the generated report. Redirects and DNS rebinding could also bypass a check performed only on the initial URL if the destination is not re ...[truncated 773 chars]
Remediation
<![CDATA[ ## Remediation Suggestions 1. Accept only explicitly formed `http://` or `https://` URLs; reject all other schemes, including `file`, `ftp`, `data`, and browser-specific schemes. 2. Resolve the hostname before each request and reject destinations in loopback, private, link-local, multicast, reserved, documentation, carrier-grade NAT, and cloud-metadata address ranges for both IPv4 and IPv6. 3. Re-resolve and revalidate the destination after every redirect. Reject redirects to a different origin unless the user explicitly approves the new public origin. 4. Defend against DNS rebinding by validating every resolved address and ensuring that the connection uses an approved resolution. 5. Block nonstandard ports unless they are explicitly required and approved. 6. Apply request timeouts, response-size limits, redirect limits, and a maximum number of fetched pages. 7. Add an explicit guardrail to `SKILL.md`, for example: ```markdown - Audit only public HTTP or HTTPS websites. - Never access loopback, private, link-local, reserved, or cloud metadata addresses. - Validate the resolved destination before every request and after every redirect. - Do not follow redirects to another origin without explicit user confirmation. ``` 8. Prefer enforcing these controls in the `http` and `browser` tool layer rather than relying solely on natural-language instructions. ]]>
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (1)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding
The trigger list is broad and includes common phrases like "seo audit" and "technical seo," which can cause the skill to activate outside the author's intended context. While the skill is read-only and does not perform sensitive actions, unintended invocation could still lead to unnecessary external requests or the skill being selected when a more appropriate tool should handle the task.

VirusTotal

64/64 vendors flagged this skill as clean.

View on VirusTotal

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.