Back to skill

Security audit

法律检索助手

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple Chinese legal-research instruction skill with no code, persistence, credential access, or hidden execution behavior, though users should treat its safety and legal-accuracy claims cautiously.

Install only if you want a Chinese-language legal research helper for the listed areas. Do not rely on its self-asserted CLEAN or verified labels as legal or platform assurance, and verify legal citations with authoritative current sources before acting on them.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding
The trigger phrases are generic legal-help terms that can match ordinary user requests, so the skill may activate in situations broader than the user expects. In a legal-assistance context, overly broad invocation can route sensitive legal queries into this skill without clear consent or scope boundaries, increasing the chance of unintended handling or misleading task selection.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding
The description indicates Chinese-language operation without presenting it as a user-selectable preference or clearly documenting a locale restriction. This can cause misunderstanding, incorrect output language, or reduced usability for users expecting another language, which is a scope and UX safety issue rather than a direct exploit path.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.