Back to skill

Security audit

Working Capital Cash Cycle Optimizer

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

The skill provides informational working-capital advice and does not appear to access accounts, move money, call external services, or persist data.

This appears safe to install for informational cash-flow and working-capital planning. Users should treat its financial recommendations as general guidance, verify current rates or product claims, and consult a qualified professional before acting on major financing or supplier-payment decisions.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (4)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The file includes an example scenario and expected output entirely in Chinese, but nowhere indicates that the skill is bilingual, locale-specific, or that users may choose their preferred language. This can violate language/locale policy by implicitly forcing a specific language experience without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The manifest sets the skill language to "en" with no indication that users can choose another language or that the English-only constraint is required for a region-specific or compliance reason. This is a natural-language policy concern because it imposes a locale choice without opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The examples present one scenario entirely in Chinese and others in English, but the document does not state whether the skill supports multiple languages or let the user choose a preferred language. This can be read as implicitly forcing output/input expectations by locale without an explicit opt-in or language-selection policy.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

Line L110 includes the Chinese comment "其他skill类似" in a file that otherwise uses English, which introduces a language-specific instruction/context without any user choice or documented locale justification. This matches the policy category for language or locale violations in natural-language content.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.