Back to skill

Security audit

Screen Time Auditor

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a simple manual screen-time coaching aid with no evidence of hidden data collection, persistence, or unsafe system access.

Installers should understand this as a manual coaching template, not clinical care or device-management software. Users should provide only the screen-time details they are comfortable sharing; the inspected artifact does not collect telemetry or enforce app limits itself.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (3)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The description says to use the skill when someone 'feels trapped by scrolling, checking, or rebound screen behavior,' which is broad natural language that can overlap with many casual productivity or wellness requests. It does not provide explicit trigger phrases, scope limits, or negative examples clarifying when this skill should not activate.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
79% confidence
Finding

The README presents the skill bilingually and includes a Chinese-only usage scenario alongside English scenarios, but it does not state whether the skill will adapt to the user's preferred language. This can create a natural-language policy concern if the skill implicitly forces or defaults to a language without explicit user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding

The file introduces a Chinese alias and later includes a full Chinese usage scenario, but it does not state whether responses should follow the user's language preference or ask for consent before switching languages. This can violate language/locale policy expectations if the skill outputs a language the user did not request.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.