ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

Event Ticket Help Sheet

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a prompt-only event ticket logistics helper with clear safeguards and no executable or network behavior.

Before installing, users should understand this skill helps prepare legitimate support materials for event entry problems. It should not be used to alter tickets, fake receipts, share QR codes publicly, or bypass venue rules.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (3)

Instruction Override

High
Category
Prompt Injection
Content
- Decide when to arrive and what to bring if entry may be slow.
- Create a clear script for support chat, box office, or gate staff.

Do not use it to fabricate purchase proof, alter screenshots, evade age or ID rules, bypass security, duplicate tickets, resell improperly, or obtain unauthorized entry.

## Best Inputs
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding
This pattern attempts to override system instructions or ignore safety constraints. Without LLM analysis, manual review is recommended.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding
The acceptance criteria explicitly require "Public-facing documentation is English only," which imposes a language policy rather than offering user choice. Under the policy rules, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless clearly justified as region-specific, which is not provided here.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding
The manifest sets the skill language to "en", which is a natural-language policy concern when no user opt-in or documented regional justification is provided. This can restrict users to a specific language experience by default.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.