Security audit

AI Meeting Room

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Korean AI advisory-panel skill that uses web search for data-backed discussion and shows no evidence of code execution, persistence, credential access, or destructive behavior.

Install this if you want a Korean-language, data-driven advisory meeting format. Be aware that it can activate on broad discussion/review prompts and will automatically run web searches for the topic, so avoid using it for private or sensitive ideas unless you are comfortable with that research flow.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (5)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Confidence: 97% confidence
Finding: The trigger phrases are extremely broad, including common terms like 'review this idea', 'discuss', 'meeting', and generic Korean equivalents. This can cause the skill to activate for many normal user requests outside its intended scope, leading to inappropriate routing, unexpected web searches, and over-application of the skill’s prescriptive workflow.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Confidence: 88% confidence
Finding: SQP-3 applies to all file types and covers language or locale policy violations. This file defines role instructions only in Korean, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the Korean-only constraint is justified as region-specific.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Confidence: 95% confidence
Finding: The document presents all operational guidance and examples only in Korean, which can amount to a language/locale policy violation when no user opt-in or alternative language option is provided. The file does not state that it is intended only for Korean-speaking users or a Korea-specific context.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Confidence: 85% confidence
Finding: The manifest description is written partly in Korean and partly in English, but the skill does not explicitly state that users can choose their preferred output language or locale. This creates a language-policy concern because the skill appears to assume a default mixed-language presentation without opt-in.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Confidence: 91% confidence
Finding: This markdown file contains user-facing instructions exclusively in Korean, and there is no indication that the skill is intentionally limited to Korean-speaking users or that users can opt into another language. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a natural-language policy violation.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.