OpenClaw Telegram ACP Troubleshooter

Diagnose why Telegram forum topics do not reliably route into OpenClaw ACP sessions backed by codex. 诊断 Telegram 话题为何无法稳定进入 OpenClaw 的 codex ACP 会话。

Use this skill when Telegram group topics are expected to talk directly to an ACP session, but the bot does not reply reliably. 当 Telegram 群组话题本应直接进入 ACP 会话，但机器人回复不稳定时，使用这个 skill。

This skill is designed to be self-contained for workspace use and ClawHub publishing. 这个 skill 设计为可独立打包，既可在本地工作区使用，也可直接发布到 ClawHub。

Read First | 先读这些

Review these files before concluding anything: 在下结论之前，先看这些文件：

• {baseDir}/README.md
• {baseDir}/TROUBLESHOOTING.md
• {baseDir}/FAQ.md

Primary Rule | 核心判断

If /new works but normal topic text does not, do not blame ACP first. Treat Telegram delivery as the leading suspect until logs prove otherwise. 如果 /new 能工作，但普通话题文本不工作，先不要怀疑 ACP。除非日志证明不是，否则优先把 Telegram 投递当成头号嫌疑。

Workflow | 诊断顺序

1. Confirm the routing target: 确认路由目标：
   • group default agent
   • topic-level agentId
   • requireMention setting
2. Confirm gateway health: 确认 gateway 健康状态：
   • systemctl --user is-active openclaw-gateway
   • inspect the current gateway log
3. Confirm OpenClaw ingestion: 确认 OpenClaw 是否真的收到了输入：
   • watch ~/.openclaw/logs/commands.log
   • inspect the relevant session file under ~/.openclaw/agents/codex/sessions/
4. Separate the failure class: 区分故障类别：
   • token or auth
   • duplicate poller
   • Telegram not delivering normal text
   • routing bound to the wrong agent
5. Recommend the next action in priority order, with evidence. 按概率和证据给出下一步动作。
6. If the user wants durable documentation, point them to: 如果用户想要长期保存文档，指向：
   • {baseDir}/README.md for usage
   • {baseDir}/TROUBLESHOOTING.md for the full runbook
   • {baseDir}/FAQ.md for short operator answers

Strong Heuristics | 强判断规则

• /new works: ACP path is alive.
• /new works: ACP path is alive.
• outbound send works: token is valid enough for sends.
• plain text missing from commands.log: Telegram delivery problem or upstream filter.
• 409 Conflict: another poller is active.
• privacy mode was recently changed: re-add the bot before patching code.

中文解释：

• /new 能回复：ACP 通路正常。
• 能主动发消息：token 至少对发送是有效的。
• 普通文本没进 commands.log：大概率是 Telegram 投递或更上游的过滤问题。
• 409 Conflict：还有别的轮询器在抢同一个 bot token。
• 刚改过 privacy mode：先移除并重新拉机器人入群，再谈改代码。

Safe Commands | 安全命令

systemctl --user show -p MainPID -p ActiveEnterTimestamp openclaw-gateway
tail -f ~/.openclaw/logs/commands.log
tail -f /tmp/openclaw/openclaw-$(date +%F).log

Response Format | 输出格式

Always return: 始终按下面格式返回：

1. current conclusion
2. evidence
3. next single best action
4. what to test after that

Constraints | 约束

• Do not reveal secret values from env vars, 1Password, or config.
• Do not recommend source patches before Telegram delivery checks are exhausted.
• Prefer topic-level binding for important threads.
• Keep recommendations actionable and ordered by probability.

中文约束：

• 不要泄露 env、1Password 或配置中的密钥值。
• 在 Telegram 投递问题没排干净前，不要先建议改源码。
• 重要话题优先使用 topic 级绑定。
• 建议必须可执行，并按概率高低排序。