Debate con agent for you
v1.0.2Provide rigorous, structured opposition by pinpointing logical flaws, data gaps, assumption risks, and implementation blind spots in user arguments or propos...
⭐ 0· 105·0 current·0 all-time
byJay@goog
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
high confidencePurpose & Capability
Name/description (provide structured opposition to a user's argument) match the SKILL.md instructions. No unexpected binaries, environment variables, or config paths are requested — all consistent with an instruction-only debate agent.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md stays within the stated purpose (deconstruct arguments, identify logical/data/assumption/implementation issues, produce structured rebuttals). It requires no file or network access. Note: the rules enforce an uncompromising negative stance ('Never soften', 'firm stance') which may produce harsh or potentially manipulative outputs; consider adding explicit safety constraints (no targeted harassment, no illegal advice).
Install Mechanism
No install spec and no code files — instruction-only. This is lowest-risk for arbitrary code execution or disk writes.
Credentials
The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. Nothing requests access to unrelated services or secrets; proportional to the stated purpose.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and autonomous invocation is the platform default. The skill does not request persistent system presence or modify other skills/configs. No privilege escalation signals present.
Assessment
This skill is internally coherent and low-risk technically (no installs, no secrets). Before installing, consider: 1) provenance: the source/homepage is unknown — only install from publishers you trust. 2) content risk: the agent is explicitly instructed to be uncompromising and adversarial; it may produce strong, blunt, or manipulative arguments. If you care about safety, ask the publisher to add clear guardrails in SKILL.md (e.g., 'do not produce hate speech, do not target individuals or give illegal instructions, avoid doxxing'). 3) privacy: avoid submitting sensitive or personally identifying material as input because the skill will craft adversarial rebuttals using whatever you provide. 4) testing: try samples first to confirm tone and behavior match your expectations, and keep the skill user-invocable (not auto-enabled) if you want human control over when it runs.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latestvk97fceeke74385ze19s8be4p5x846vec
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.