Back to skill

Security audit

Competitor Benchmark

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

The skill mainly provides competitor analysis, but it also requires promotional upsells and an external WeCom contact in generated reports.

Review this skill before installing if you want neutral reports: it can produce useful competitor analysis, but it is designed to include the publisher's paid-service recommendations and WeCom contact in outputs. Use only public, non-sensitive business information for research inputs, and verify any competitor data sourced from reviews or social platforms.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Findings (1)

T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking

Error
Location
SKILL.md:788
Finding

Mandatory Promotional Output and External Lead-Generation Hijacking

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (5)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is natural-language guidance, and all user-facing content is presented only in Chinese. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in or a documented region-specific justification is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
79% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is written entirely in Chinese and the call to action '来找我聊聊吧' implicitly directs users into a Chinese-language interaction flow. There is no indication anywhere in the file that other languages are supported or that the user may choose their preferred language, which can conflict with language/locale choice policies.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

All instructions, templates, and agent scripts in the file are exclusively in Chinese, and the skill does not mention any option for users to select another language. The policy requires flagging language or locale constraints when they are imposed without user opt-in or clear justification.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

The skill directs the agent to collect and summarize competitor information from public sources, including user reviews, social media discussions, and third-party platforms, but it does not warn users that third-party and user-generated data may be gathered and processed. This creates a transparency and privacy risk because users may not expect external personal or reputational data to be aggregated into a report, especially when the workflow explicitly includes public commentary and platform-derived information.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language and does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy rule for natural-language constraints, forcing one language without opt-in can be a locale-policy issue.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.