Tp2
- Category
- MCP Tool Poisoning
- Confidence
- 85% confidence
- Finding
Mixing characters from multiple Unicode scripts in a single identifier is a common technique to create visually ambiguous tool names.
- Content
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Markdown-only personal investment research framework with no code, account access, persistence, or automatic trading, though users should treat its trading outputs as high-risk drafts.
Install only if you want a Chinese-language personal investment research checklist. Do not connect it to brokerage workflows or let it make trades automatically; review any suggested prices, stop-losses, targets, or position sizes yourself and avoid entering account credentials or personal financial identifiers.
Mixing characters from multiple Unicode scripts in a single identifier is a common technique to create visually ambiguous tool names.
Mixing characters from multiple Unicode scripts in a single identifier is a common technique to create visually ambiguous tool names.
The manifest description forces a specific language/locale for core behavior and user-facing content, and there is no indication that users may choose another language. This can violate language/locale policy where skills must not impose a language without explicit user opt-in.
The main markdown content is predominantly Chinese and provides no instruction that the skill should adapt to the user's preferred language. Because the file does not document a justified region-specific constraint or an opt-in language selection, this is a natural-language policy concern.
The skill repeatedly frames itself as 'personal research only' but then describes 实操买卖 workflows, month-level trading cadence, stop-loss rules, and operational decision outputs. That mismatch increases the chance that an integrating agent or user treats the skill as suitable for real trading decisions, weakening safety boundaries through contradictory instructions.
The skill claims in one section that it does not generate concrete trading parameters, yet elsewhere instructs the agent to provide buy/sell levels, stop-losses, targets, and position sizing. This inconsistency can bypass policy expectations and lead a host agent to produce operational financial guidance despite the surrounding safety disclaimers.
No suspicious patterns detected.