Back to skill

Security audit

Claims Expert Digital Employee

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a non-executable insurance-claims workflow reference skill with no requested tools, install hooks, persistence, or automatic access to customer systems.

Install only if you want a Chinese-language insurance-claims reference workflow. Do not paste full identifiers, bank account numbers, or detailed medical records unless they are minimized or masked, and treat any generated settlement, denial, fraud, notification, or closure text as a draft that must be checked in your institution's authorized systems by qualified staff.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • MCP Tool PoisoningHidden Instructions, Unicode Deception, Parameter Description Injection
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (4)

Intent-Code Divergence

High
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
98% confidence
Finding

Module 2 tells users the skill is not suitable for inpatient expense review, while Module 3 later provides exactly that workflow in detail. This inconsistency can cause operators or downstream agents to apply the wrong module, bypass intended review boundaries, or rely on conflicting guidance during real claims handling.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Intent-Code Divergence

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The 2026-09-10 maintenance note says the revision '删除…结案归档与通知类动作表述'. However, the current body still includes a full Module 8 for claim notifications and customer communication, plus case-closing/archiving guidance with explicit boundary handling. This is an active contradiction between change-log documentation and the actual content of the file.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The skill manifest description forces a specific language/locale presentation rather than explicitly offering multilingual output based on user preference. Under the stated policy, language constraints should be user-selectable or clearly justified as region-specific.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding

The activation and non-applicable scenarios define how the skill is used, but they are written only in Chinese and do not state that users may choose another language. This can amount to a locale/language policy issue unless the Chinese-only scope is justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.