T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
SKILL.md:5- Finding
Unpinned Third-Party Executable Dependency
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, line 5
Vulnerability Type: Unpinned executable from a third-party Homebrew tap
Risk Level: MediumVulnerable Code
yaml metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🧾","requires":{"bins":["summarize"]},"install":[{"id":"brew","kind":"brew","formula":"steipete/tap/summarize","bins":["summarize"],"label":"Install summarize (brew)"}]}}Technical Analysis
The skill directs the environment to obtain the
summarizeexecutable from the third-party Homebrew tapsteipete/tap. The dependency declaration does not pin an immutable package version, source commit, artifact digest, or checksum. The executable's implementation is also not included in the audited project.Consequently, the code ultimately installed can change after this skill has been reviewed. This creates a supply-chain trust boundary: compromise of the tap, its release infrastructure, or an upstream artifact could cause users to install code different from the code originally intended or assessed.
No evidence in the supplied files establishes that the current package is malicious. The issue is the absence of controls that guarantee dependency provenance and immutability.
Attack Path
- An attacker compromises the third-party tap, its maintainer account, release infrastructure, or an artifact referenced by its formula.
- The attacker modifies the formula or published package so that it installs a malicious
summarizeexecutable. - A user or agent processes the skill's installation metadata and installs
steipete/tap/summarize. - Homebrew retrieves the attacker-controlled formula or artifact because no immutable version and verified digest are specified by the skill.
- The malicious executable runs during installation or when the skill invokes
summarize. - It can access resources available to the invoking account, potentially including selected local files, provider API keys, configuration files, and network connectivity. ...[truncated 547 chars]
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Pin the dependency to an immutable, reviewed version rather than a mutable formula reference.
- Verify downloaded artifacts with a cryptographic checksum or signature tied to that version.
- Pin the tap or source repository to a reviewed commit where supported.
- Prefer a trusted official package registry or distribution channel with provenance and signing controls.
- Document the exact upstream source, version, artifact digest, and verification procedure.
- Audit or vendor the executable's source when the deployment's threat model requires reproducible review.
- Run the CLI with least privilege in a sandbox that exposes only the specific input file required for summarization.
- Restrict environment variables and credentials provided to the process, and use narrowly scoped, revocable API keys.
- Add automated dependency monitoring and require security review before updating the pinned version.
