Back to skill

Security audit

interaction-design-sop

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a text-only frontend interaction design checklist with no hidden execution, data access, persistence, or credential behavior.

This skill appears safe to install as a design-process helper. Users should expect it to make frontend work more structured and prescriptive, especially around mandatory UI states and destructive-action confirmations, but it does not add code execution or privileged access.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Behavioral ASTexec() Call, eval() Call, Dynamic Import
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (3)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

This eval prompt is written entirely in Chinese, and the file provides no indication that other languages are supported or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-speaking or region-specific context. Under the policy, locale or language constraints should be optional or explicitly justified rather than implicitly enforced.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

This eval prompt is written entirely in Chinese, which implies the skill is expected to operate in Chinese for at least this evaluation path. Because the file does not indicate that language selection is optional or user-chosen, it presents a natural-language locale policy concern under the rule for forced language without opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
63% confidence
Finding

The prompt on this line is in English while the other example is in Chinese, but the file contains no natural-language guidance about supported languages or how locale is selected. This can create an implicit, undocumented language policy instead of an explicit user choice.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.