Back to skill

Security audit

1688 Procurement Agent

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a disclosed 1688 procurement coaching skill with no executable code, persistence, credential handling, or hidden behavior found.

Use this as advisory procurement guidance, not as an automatic purchasing authority. Confirm that broad questions are about 1688 sourcing before applying the skill, verify supplier and payment details independently, and treat payment or compliance decisions as user-controlled business decisions.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The command reference maps very broad, natural phrases like "What should I buy?" or "Is this a scam?" to skill modules. In an agent ecosystem, such generic triggers can cause unintended activation during ordinary conversation, leading the agent to inject procurement-specific guidance when the user did not explicitly invoke this skill.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding

The onboarding section presents translation to English as the default solution path for navigating the Chinese platform, including explicit steps to translate the site to English. This creates a language preference assumption rather than offering language choice or clarifying that English is optional.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.