Back to skill

Security audit

Huorengan

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a coherent bilingual writing-editing skill with no code execution, network access, persistence, or hidden data handling.

Install this if you want a Chinese/English prose editor that can flag and rewrite AI-sounding text. In edit mode, review file changes because it may modify prose in place, but the artifacts clearly instruct it to avoid changing protected facts, code, commands, paths, quotes, and metrics.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (4)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
81% confidence
Finding

The comments define separate behavior by language, including different sentence-length units for Chinese vs. English and language-specific connector preferences. Because the file hard-codes locale-dependent writing behavior without any accompanying indication that users can choose or opt into a language setting, it risks enforcing a language/locale policy implicitly.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The document is written as a normative contract and states its goals entirely in Chinese, establishing the skill's expected behavior in a specific language. There is no indication that users may opt into another language or that the Chinese-only constraint is justified by a region-specific use case.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The file explicitly describes preserving "Chinese completeness verbatim," and the entire operational guidance is written only in Chinese. This suggests a language-specific constraint without any opt-in, alternative language path, or justification that the skill is region-specific.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The title and introductory description state the guidance in Chinese and indicate cross-language applicability, but the file does not offer users a language/locale choice or explain why Chinese-only presentation is required. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.