Security audit

Feasibility Study

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a straightforward feasibility-study guide with no hidden data access, persistence, or privileged behavior found.

Installers should know this is mostly a procedural guide, not an automated analysis engine. It may direct the agent to search the web for current market or regulatory facts, so review sources and assumptions before making business or investment decisions.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

MCP Tool PoisoningHidden Instructions, Unicode Deception, Parameter Description Injection
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (1)

Tp4

High

Category: MCP Tool Poisoning
Confidence: 98% confidence
Finding: The declared description promises a comprehensive feasibility-analysis capability, but the supplied code does not implement any such analysis, frameworks, or supporting logic. It only prints a static example message and includes TODO comments. This is a material mismatch in primary purpose and delivered capability, even though there is no evidence of undeclared sensitive behavior.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.