Code Reviewer

Automated code review for pull requests and code snippets. Analyzes code quality, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and best practices across Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Rust, and Shell scripts. Use when the user wants to: (1) Review a PR before merging, (2) Check a code snippet for bugs or anti-patterns, (3) Get security audit of code changes, (4) Improve code quality with actionable suggestions, (5) Ensure consistency with project style guides. Best for developers, teams wanting automated pre-merge reviews, and anyone who wants a second pair of eyes on their code.

Automated code review analysis for quality, security, performance, and best practices.

When to Use

✅ USE this skill when:

• "Review this code for bugs"
• "Check my PR before I submit it"
• "Is there any security issue in this function?"
• "Can you optimize this code?"
• "Review this git diff"
• "Does this follow [language] best practices?"
• "Compare these two implementations"

❌ DON'T use this skill when:

• Need full test suite generation → use a testing skill
• Need architectural design review → use architecture skills
• Need deployment pipeline review → use CI/CD skills
• The code is proprietary/sensitive and shouldn't be shared

Review Checklist

For every code review, the agent checks in this order:

1. 🔴 Critical (must fix)

Check	What to look for
SQL Injection	String concatenation in queries, unescaped user input
XSS	Unsanitized output in HTML/templates, dangerouslySetInnerHTML
Command Injection	os.system(), exec(), subprocess(shell=True) with user input
Path Traversal	../../ in file paths, unsanitized filenames
Sensitive Data	Hardcoded API keys, passwords, tokens, secrets
Unvalidated Input	Missing type checks, no boundary validation on arrays/buffers

2. 🟡 Important (should fix)

Check	What to look for
Null/Undefined	Missing null checks, no Optional/Maybe wrapping
Error Handling	Bare except:, swallowed exceptions, no error context
Race Conditions	Shared state without locks, async without mutexes
Resource Leaks	Unclosed files, connections, handles
Type Safety	Implicit casts, any types, missing generics
Dead Code	Unused variables, imports, unreachable branches

3. 🟢 Nice to have

Check	What to look for
Naming	Vague names (data, tmp, foo), inconsistent casing
Comments	Stale/no comments, commented-out code
Duplication	Repeated logic that should be a function
Logging	Missing context in log messages, wrong log level
Tests	Missing edge cases, no test for the change

Workflow

Step 1: Accept Input

The agent accepts code in these forms:

• Pasted code block: "Review this function: ```python ..."
• File path: "Review src/app.js"
• Git diff: "Review my uncommitted changes" → runs git diff
• GitHub PR URL: "Review https://github.com/user/repo/pull/42"
• Branch comparison: "Review changes between main and feature-branch"

Step 2: Analyze

For each code segment:

1. Identify the language and framework
2. Run the checklist above
3. Cross-reference common anti-patterns for the language
4. Check for performance traps (N+1 queries, O(n²) in loops, etc.)

Step 3: Report

Present findings in order of severity with:

text

## 🔴 Critical
- [Line 42] SQL Injection: f-string used in SQL query. Use parameterized queries.

## 🟡 Important
- [Line 15] Missing null check: `user.getName()` may throw if user is None

## 🟢 Suggestion
- [Line 88] Duplicate logic with lines 12-20 — extract to helper function

Step 4: Offer Fixes (Optional)

The agent can:

• Show the fix inline
• Generate a patch file
• Apply changes directly (with confirmation)

Language-Specific Rules

Python

• Prefer f-strings over .format() or %
• Use with for resource management
• Type hints on function signatures
• List comprehensions over map/filter
• Avoid mutable default arguments

JavaScript / TypeScript

• const over let, never var
• Prefer early returns over nested ifs
• Use === not ==
• Async/await over raw promises
• Avoid any in TypeScript

Java

• Use Optional over null returns
• Prefer try-with-resources
• Favor composition over inheritance
• Use interface types, not concrete types

Go

• Always check errors
• Use go fmt conventions
• Prefer defer for cleanup
• Avoid global state

Shell / Bash

• Quote all variable expansions
• Use set -euo pipefail in scripts
• Prefer [[ ]] over [ ]
• Avoid parsing ls output

Examples

User: "Review this Python function" + code block Agent: Runs checklist → finds SQL injection. Reports 🔴 Critical with fix

User: "Check my current git diff" Agent: Runs git diff, reviews changes, lists findings

User: "Is this TypeScript safe?" + code block Agent: Checks types, null safety, anti-patterns → 🟡 reports any misuse

Notes

• For large PRs, focus on changed lines only
• Flag false positives transparently
• If a file is too large, review the most critical areas first