Market Competitor Research

Research competitors systematically. Analyze positioning, pricing, features, marketing, and gaps. Generate competitive intelligence reports with actionable i...

MIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
0 · 11 · 0 current installs · 0 all-time installs
MIT-0
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Benign
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
Purpose & Capability
The name, description, and SKILL.md are consistent: the guidance covers competitor identification, positioning, pricing, marketing, technical analysis, and report templates — all coherent with "Market Competitor Research." There are no unrelated required binaries, environment variables, or config paths.
Instruction Scope
Instructions stay within public-sources research (company websites, review sites, social media, BuiltWith/Wappalyzer, job postings, SEC filings). The skill does not instruct reading local files or secrets. Note: implementing the methods could involve scraping or automated queries; that has legal, terms-of-service, and rate-limit implications and should be done with care (prefer official APIs, respect robots.txt and site terms).
Install Mechanism
This is an instruction-only skill with no install spec and no code files, so nothing will be downloaded or written to disk by the skill itself.
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables, credentials, or config paths. There is no disproportionate request for secrets or unrelated service access.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false and user-invocable are appropriate. The skill does not request persistent presence or system-wide changes. Autonomous invocation is allowed by platform default but this skill does not ask for elevated privileges.
Assessment
This skill appears coherent and low-risk: it only prescribes public-source research and report templates and asks for no credentials or installs. Before use, consider these practical points: (1) Avoid pasting proprietary or sensitive information into prompts (customer lists, non-public docs, credentials). (2) If you automate web scraping, follow sites' terms of service, rate limits, and robots.txt — prefer official APIs. (3) Verify facts and numbers the skill gathers (public sources can be outdated or incorrect). (4) If you want to prevent the skill from running autonomously, restrict its invocation in your agent configuration. If you need higher assurance, request provenance for any automated data collection the skill performs (which sites, what queries, whether data is cached).

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

Current versionv1.0.0
Download zip
analysisvk978tjq48rrm810qw4t22qa8x1831f0gbenchmarkvk978tjq48rrm810qw4t22qa8x1831f0gcompetitorvk978tjq48rrm810qw4t22qa8x1831f0glatestvk978tjq48rrm810qw4t22qa8x1831f0gmarketvk978tjq48rrm810qw4t22qa8x1831f0gresearchvk978tjq48rrm810qw4t22qa8x1831f0g

License

MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.

SKILL.md

Competitor Research

Systematic competitive analysis to understand your market position and find opportunities.

Research Framework

1. Identify Competitors

Direct Competitors:

  • Same product category
  • Same target market
  • Similar features/pricing

Indirect Competitors:

  • Different product, same need
  • Alternative solutions
  • Adjacent markets

Emerging Competitors:

  • New entrants
  • Startups
  • Platform expansions

How to Find:

- Search "[product] alternatives"
- Check review sites (G2, Capterra)
- Industry reports
- Customer suggestions
- Social media mentions
- App store categories

2. Analyze Positioning

Value Proposition:

  • What do they claim?
  • Who do they target?
  • What problem do they solve?
  • How do they differentiate?

Positioning Map:

                Premium
                   │
    ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
    │              │              │
    │   Competitor A    Competitor B
    │              │              │
Enterprise ───────┼─────── SMB
    │              │              │
    │   Competitor C    You
    │              │              │
    └──────────────┼──────────────┘
                   │
              Commodity

3. Evaluate Features

Feature Matrix:

FeatureYouComp AComp BComp C
Core Feature 1
Core Feature 2
Advanced Feature
Integration X
Mobile App

Gap Analysis:

  • Features only you have → Differentiation
  • Features everyone has → Table stakes
  • Features you lack → Competitive disadvantage
  • Features no one has → Opportunity

4. Pricing Analysis

Pricing Models:

  • Free tier + Premium
  • Per-seat pricing
  • Usage-based
  • Enterprise contracts
  • One-time purchase

Price Comparison:

| Plan | You | Comp A | Comp B |
|------|-----|--------|--------|
| Free | 5 users | 3 users | 10 users |
| Pro | $29/user | $25/user | $35/user |
| Enterprise | Custom | $99/user | Quote |

Pricing Strategy:

  • Undercut? Risk race to bottom
  • Premium? Need clear differentiation
  • Match? Compete on features

5. Marketing Analysis

Channels:

  • Where do they advertise?
  • What content do they create?
  • Which communities are they in?
  • Who are their partners?

Messaging:

  • Keywords they target
  • Tone and voice
  • Claims and promises
  • Social proof used

Content Strategy:

  • Blog frequency
  • Content types
  • Distribution channels
  • Engagement metrics

6. Technical Analysis

Technology Stack:

- Framework/Language
- Cloud provider
- Third-party integrations
- Open source dependencies

Performance:

  • Load time
  • Uptime
  • Scale limits
  • Security posture

Developer Experience:

  • API quality
  • Documentation
  • SDK availability
  • Community support

Research Methods

Public Sources

Company Website:

  • About page
  • Pricing page
  • Feature pages
  • Case studies
  • Blog
  • Press releases

Review Sites:

  • G2
  • Capterra
  • Product Hunt
  • AlternativeTo
  • TrustRadius

Social Media:

  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit communities
  • Discord servers
  • YouTube

Industry Sources:

  • News sites
  • Podcasts
  • Conference talks
  • Investor updates
  • SEC filings (public companies)

Technical Sources

Built With:

  • BuiltWith.com
  • Wappalyzer
  • GitHub repos
  • Package dependencies

Job Postings:

  • Required skills reveal stack
  • Growth areas
  • Strategic priorities

API Documentation:

  • Capabilities
  • Rate limits
  • Integration options

Customer Intelligence

Reviews:

  • What customers love
  • What they complain about
  • Feature requests
  • Switching reasons

Customer Interviews:

  • Why they chose competitor
  • What they'd improve
  • Switching costs
  • Unmet needs

Community:

  • Forum discussions
  • Support tickets (public)
  • Feature request boards
  • User groups

Analysis Templates

SWOT Analysis

COMPETITOR: [Name]

Strengths:
- What they do well
- Resources they have
- Market position
- Unique advantages

Weaknesses:
- Product gaps
- Customer complaints
- Technical debt
- Market limitations

Opportunities:
- Markets they could enter
- Features they could add
- Partnerships possible
- Trends they could leverage

Threats:
- New entrants
- Technology shifts
- Market changes
- Regulatory risks

Competitor Profile

## [Competitor Name]

### Basic Info
- Founded: [Year]
- Funding: [Amount/Round]
- Employees: [Count]
- Location: [HQ]
- Market: [Segment]

### Product
- Core offering: [Description]
- Key features: [List]
- Pricing: [Model]
- Target: [Customer]

### Positioning
- Value prop: [One line]
- Differentiation: [How]
- Messaging: [Tone/Style]

### Traction
- Users: [Count]
- Revenue: [Estimate]
- Growth: [Rate]
- Markets: [Geography]

### Strengths
- [Top 3 strengths]

### Weaknesses
- [Top 3 weaknesses]

### Strategy Implications
- How should we respond?
- What can we learn?
- Where can we win?

Actionable Outputs

Competitive Report

# [Industry] Competitive Analysis

## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs on market position and key findings]

## Market Overview
- Market size: $X billion
- Growth rate: Y%
- Key trends: [List]

## Competitor Landscape

### Direct Competitors

#### [Competitor A]
[Profile]

#### [Competitor B]
[Profile]

### Indirect Competitors
[Brief profiles]

## Feature Comparison
[Matrix]

## Pricing Comparison
[Table]

## Gap Analysis
- Features only we have: [List]
- Features we lack: [List]
- Opportunities: [List]

## Recommendations
1. [Priority action]
2. [Priority action]
3. [Priority action]

## Appendix
[Detailed data]

Battle Card

# [Competitor Name] Battle Card

## When They Come Up
- [Scenario where prospect mentions them]

## How We Win
- [Key differentiator 1]
- [Key differentiator 2]
- [Key differentiator 3]

## Common Objections
| Objection | Response |
|-----------|----------|
| "They're cheaper" | [Response] |
| "They have X feature" | [Response] |
| "They're bigger" | [Response] |

## Proof Points
- [Case study]
- [Testimonial]
- [Metric]

## Don't Say
- [What to avoid]

## Do Say
- [Key messages]

Continuous Monitoring

Set Up Alerts

Google Alerts:
- "[competitor name]"
- "[competitor product]"
- "[competitor CEO]"

Social Mentions:
- Twitter lists
- LinkedIn follows
- Reddit saves
- Newsletters

Track Changes

Weekly:

  • News mentions
  • Social activity
  • Blog posts

Monthly:

  • Pricing changes
  • Feature releases
  • Hiring patterns

Quarterly:

  • Full re-analysis
  • Strategy update
  • Report to stakeholders

Ethical Guidelines

Do:

  • Use public sources
  • Cite sources properly
  • Focus on facts
  • Update regularly
  • Share internally only

Don't:

  • Misrepresent yourself
  • Access private information
  • Share confidential data
  • Make false claims
  • Use for defamation

Tools

Research:

  • Google (search, alerts, trends)
  • Social media monitoring
  • Review aggregators
  • News aggregators

Analysis:

  • Spreadsheets
  • SWOT templates
  • Positioning maps
  • Feature matrices

Monitoring:

  • RSS readers
  • Newsletter subscriptions
  • Social lists
  • Calendar reminders

Files

1 total
Select a file
Select a file to preview.

Comments

Loading comments…