Version Decider

Decide the NEXT SemVer version number from the SCOPE OF CODE CHANGES for an upcoming release, and output a single, unambiguous recommendation with cited standard clauses. Use only when the user is deciding which version to assign to a release they are about to cut (e.g. "what version should this release be", "major or minor or patch", "what to bump in 0.x", "how to advance alpha/beta/rc", "is this breaking"). NOT for: looking up an already-published version, asking the install command, CalVer/date-based versioning, or general release/project-management questions. Ships a deterministic arithmetic core: same input always yields the same output.

Give developers (especially beginners) a single, unambiguous version-number recommendation, with the reasoning behind it.

---

⚠️ Cross-cutting hard constraints (must hold every turn; do not drop them under context compression)

These 5 rules apply in every turn of the conversation. If this section is no longer visible in context, re-read this file.

1. Never assume a breaking change on the user's behalf. A version number's entire purpose is a compatibility promise to dependents; one wrong guess costs downstream production incidents. Whenever "is it breaking?" is in doubt, ask.
2. Never guess the current version. Always look it up from the project first (see Step 1). If you can't find it, ask. Never assume it starts at 1.0.0 or 0.0.1.
3. Give exactly one version recommendation. If two reasonable options exist, name the primary one and state the precondition for the alternative — never list several and make the user pick.
4. Justify with the specific change + the standard's clause number (e.g. SemVer §8). Never substitute empty phrases like "because it's a big change" for reasoning.
5. Let the script do the arithmetic. Always compute the version with scripts/semver_check.py; never do it by hand. If the script fails, show the raw error to the user verbatim — never fabricate a version number.

---

Language

• This skill's SKILL.md and references/ are English by default (ClawHub Natural Language Policy: English default).
• All user-facing output follows the user's language: if the user writes in Chinese, reply in Chinese.
• The CLI core scripts/semver_check.py localizes its reasons / error messages / level descriptions via --lang en|zh|auto. auto detects LC_ALL/LC_MESSAGES/LANG and falls back to en. JSON keys (current/next/level/...) stay English; values follow --lang.
• JSON reports/logs remain English only (per the policy's "JSON logs & reports English only" rule).

---

Capabilities & safety boundaries

• Decision engine: scripts/semver_check.py (zero-dependency Python) computes every version via deterministic arithmetic. The model must never compute a version by hand; if the script errors, show the raw error and ask, do not fabricate a number.
• Dev-only helpers: scripts/measure_skill.py (SKILL.md compliance metrics) and scripts/test_semver_check.py (37 regression tests) are maintenance tools, not part of the runtime decision flow. They are never invoked to answer a release-decision question.
• Locale only: the engine reads only the LC_ALL / LC_MESSAGES / LANG environment variables, and only to choose output language. It does not read secrets, network configuration, or any other environment data.
• No side effects: read-only inspection of local version files. No package installation, no repository mutation, no file deletion, no network calls.

---

Execution flow (5 steps, closed in a single turn)

One execution = Step 1 → 5. Each step has its own fallback; never skip a step, and never rely on a later turn to re-read this file.

Step 1 — Collect 4 groups of inputs

Input	How to get it	Fallback when missing
Current version	Inspect the project (commands below)	Ask: "Which version is currently released?"
Public API boundary	Library: read exports. App: ask "what is used externally"	If never declared → tell the user "define the public API first"; give no number this round
Change list + breaking?	Use AskUserQuestion or ask directly	If the user is vague → ask concrete questions one by one; never assume "probably not breaking"
Target ecosystem / channel	Ask	If the user doesn't care → assume npm semantics, but state this assumption in the output

Commands to find the version (by priority):

bash

cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep '"version"'          # npm / Node
cat pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null | grep -i version          # Python
grep -m1 '^VERSION' Makefile 2>/dev/null                  # C/C++
git tag --sort=-v:refname 2>/dev/null | head -5           # git tag
grep -rnoE "v[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" --include=*.md . | head   # version comments / docs

Six breaking-change checks (ask each; never default to "not breaking"): ① Public export removed/renamed? ② Function signature changed (params added/removed/reordered/typed/returned)? ③ Does a previously-successful call now fail or throw? ④ Config/env/CLI arg/default changed? ⑤ Minimum dependency version raised? ⑥ Type or field narrowed?

Item ⑥ is the easiest to miss — narrowing generics or input types is breaking even if it still compiles. Item ③ is the easiest to understate — semantic change is sneakier than a signature change.

⛔ If Step 1 reveals the project is CalVer (major segment ≥ 20 and looks like a year, e.g. 26.04): stop and tell the user this skill does not apply; do not force SemVer rules on it.

Step 2 — Grade the change

Change	Level
Remove/rename public export, signature change, behavior change, config change, module deletion	major
Deprecate (still usable), add public API, relax dependency constraint	minor
Internal refactor, perf (behavior preserved), bug fix, security fix (no API change)	patch
Docs / tests / CI / formatting only	none (no release)

Same batch is graded by major > minor > patch precedence: feat + fix → minor; feat + break → major. Deprecation must be minor (SemVer §7 mandates it), even before removal. Full table and gray zones: references/decision-tables.md.

Fallback: if unsure whether something is breaking → grade it major and state "if confirmed not breaking, downgrade to minor", handing the decision back to the user rather than assuming the optimistic case.

Step 3 — Compute

bash

python scripts/semver_check.py analyze <current> --changes "change1" "change2" ...

Change-spec syntax (the actual format of scripts/semver_check.py):

Form	Level
feat: add JSON output / feature:	minor
fix: / bugfix: / perf: / security: / refactor:	patch
docs: / test: / ci: / chore: / style: / build:	none
deprecate: mark old API deprecated	minor
revert: revert style tweak	patch
revertbreak: undo 2.0 field rename	major
break: parse() arg order changed	forces major
feat@break: swap the underlying driver	forces major

Flags: --pre alpha|beta|rc (open/advance pre-release) | --pre alpha.2 (explicit sequence) | --build 20261008.a1 (build metadata, no precedence effect) | --rebase (target a different version number within a pre-release line)

Other subcommands: check <ver> (validate + ecosystem hints) | next <ver> --level <lvl> (lvl includes stable for 0.x graduation) | explain (reasoning chain only) | compare a b (precedence)

Add --lang en|zh|auto to any subcommand to localize the output.

Fallback: if the script errors, show the raw error and fix the input per the message — never bypass the script and compute by hand (that is exactly the uncertainty this skill removes).

Step 4 — Output

Fixed four-part form: conclusion → reasoning → to confirm → next command.

text

Version recommendation: 1.3.3 -> 1.4.0

Decision: minor (backward-compatible new feature)

Reasoning:
- Add character Yang Tinghe -> new content, backward-compatible, minor (SemVer §7)
- Add achievement system -> same
- By major > minor > patch precedence -> minor, patch reset to zero

Need your confirmation:
- Does the new achievement reuse the existing localStorage key? (reuse would corrupt old players' progress and may be breaking)

Next step:
- python scripts/semver_check.py next 1.4.0 --level minor

Unconfirmed gray zones (security fix, perf refactor, raised env requirement, save-format change) must be called out; see §4 of references/decision-tables.md.

Step 5 — Wrap up

• If the conclusion depends on an unconfirmed assumption → list it under "Assumptions this round" at the end.
• If the user asks for the basis → cite the standard text in references/standards-comparison.md; don't re-repeat this file.
• If the decision is stuck on a human-approval action like 0.x graduation → state clearly "this needs you to confirm the API is frozen; I can't decide it for you".

---

Quick reference — high-frequency scenarios

Situation	Conclusion
0.x stage	Use npm/Cargo semantics: a minor bump IS the breaking boundary (^0.2.3 caps at 0.3.0). So 0.3.1 + feature → 0.4.0, not 0.3.2
0.x → 1.0.0	Not auto-derived. It is the explicit graduation action --level stable, meaning "API is stable from now on"; a human must confirm the API is frozen
Within a pre-release line	core unchanged (SemVer §9: pre-release not guaranteed to satisfy the normal version's compatibility) → keep breaking during alpha without raising major. Only alpha→beta→rc→stable, step by step; skipping is rejected by the script
Revert a non-breaking change	patch
Revert a breaking change	major — compatibility is broken a second time; dependents just recovered and are broken again
Deprecate an API	minor (spec-mandated); major when actually removed. Gives downstream a minor cycle as migration window
Edit README / comments	no release needed
Change an already-published version	forbidden (§3); only release a new version
Coexist multiple majors	Go v2+ must change the module path (/v2); npm uses dist-tag (next/beta); Python relies on virtualenvs; Rust resolves multiple versions under one package name

Beyond SemVer

• Python (PEP 440): pre-releases have no hyphen — 1.0.0rc1, not 1.0.0-rc.1. check detects this. epoch (1!1.0) only when switching numbering schemes.
• CalVer: see the ⛔ in Step 1; not applicable to this skill.

---

Files

File	Purpose	When to read
references/decision-tables.md (EN) / decision-tables.zh.md	Full decision table, confirmation checklist, edge cases, gray zones	when a grading is unclear
references/standards-comparison.md (EN) / standards-comparison.zh.md	SemVer / Conventional Commits / PEP 440 / Cargo / Go / CalVer official text and conflicts	when the user asks for the basis
references/i18n-plan.md	i18n implementation plan (ClawHub NL-policy compliance)	when changing languages/structure
scripts/semver_check.py	Decision arithmetic core (zero-dependency)	required in Step 3
scripts/test_semver_check.py	37 regression tests	after editing the script
scripts/measure_skill.py	Measures this file's compliance metrics	after editing this file
locales/en.json / locales/zh.json	User-facing copy tables	when adding/changing messages