Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
ClauseBreaker is a text-only legal document explainer with clear limits and privacy warnings, though users should treat its legal and translation output cautiously.
Before installing, understand that this skill may process sensitive legal documents, so redact identifiers and private details where possible. Use it to understand clauses and prepare questions, not as a substitute for a lawyer, and be especially careful with non-English documents because the skill bases its analysis on translation.
The manifest-style description says the skill analyzes "any legal document," which is a very broad trigger scope without explicit invocation constraints or negative examples. In a manifest/markdown context, this can overlap with many ordinary user requests involving contracts or terms and may cause unintended activation.
Mandating full translation of non-English legal documents before analysis can degrade meaning, especially for jurisdiction-specific legal terms where wording matters. In a legal-analysis skill, this can mislead users about rights, obligations, or enforceability because the downstream clause review is based on transformed text rather than the original language.
Subtle instructions detected that may alter agent decision-making or introduce hidden biases.
## Rules
- **Never tell the user whether to execute or not execute the agreement.** Your job is to inform, not decide.
- **Always include the disclaimer** at the end of every analysis.
- **Be specific about jurisdiction.** Vague statements like "this may not be enforceable" are less useful than citing the specific legal principle or statute when known.
- **Keep plain-English summaries genuinely plain.** If a non-lawyer would need to Google a word you used, replace it.
The rule 'Translate first, always' hard-codes an English-first workflow for all non-English input, which can systematically introduce interpretation errors into legal review. Because the skill also discusses enforceability and statutes, mistranslation in this context is more dangerous than in ordinary summarization and may produce incorrect negotiation guidance.
No suspicious patterns detected.