T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
pyproject.toml:6- Finding
Unpinned Dependencies Allow Unreviewed Package Versions to Execute
- Content
View full analysis
=0.5.0", "python-dotenv>=1.0.0", "pillow>=10.0.0", "click>=8.1.0", "requests>=2.31.0", ] ``` ### Technical Analysis Every runtime dependency uses an open-ended minimum version constraint. No dependency lockfile or package hashes are present in the audited project structure. Consequently, the documented `uv run` workflow may resolve package releases that were published after this project was reviewed. This weakens dependency reproducibility and creates a supply-chain exposure: a compromised maintainer account, malicious future release, or dependency takeover could cause an unreviewed package version to be installed and imported. Python package installation hooks and imported package initialization code can execute with the privileges of the user running the skill. This finding does not establish that any currently listed package is malicious. The vulnerability is the absence of controls ensuring that users execute only reviewed dependency artifacts. ### Attack Path 1. An attacker compromises a listed dependency or publishes a malicious future version satisfying its open-ended `>=` constraint. 2. A user follows the documented workflow and invokes the project through `uv run`. 3. Because no reviewed lockfile or exact version constraint is supplied, the resolver selects the attacker-controlled release. 4. Malicious installation or import-time code executes under the invoking user's account. 5. The code can access resources available to that process, potentially including the `FAL_KEY` environment variable, local source images, prompts, generated outputs, and writable user files. ### Impact Assessment Successful exploitation would provide code execution with the privileges of the user invoking the ...[truncated 579 chars]- Remediation
View remediation
