Tp2
- Category
- MCP Tool Poisoning
- Confidence
- 85% confidence
- Finding
Mixing characters from multiple Unicode scripts in a single identifier is a common technique to create visually ambiguous tool names.
- Content
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a query-rewriting guide for RAG searches, with no executable code, persistence, credential handling, or hidden install behavior found.
Install this if you want Chinese-oriented RAG query rewriting before memory or wiki searches. Be aware that broad triggers may cause extra rewritten searches, so review behavior if you discuss query rewriting concepts rather than intending to run it.
Mixing characters from multiple Unicode scripts in a single identifier is a common technique to create visually ambiguous tool names.
Mixing characters from multiple Unicode scripts in a single identifier is a common technique to create visually ambiguous tool names.
The trigger phrase '检索增强' is broad enough to match ordinary discussion about RAG or retrieval tuning, which can cause unintended activation of this skill in contexts where the user did not request query rewriting. Accidental activation can alter the agent's workflow, introduce unnecessary search fan-out, and increase the chance of context drift or retrieval of irrelevant/sensitive material.
The standalone trigger '指代消解' is a generic NLP concept and may appear in normal conversation, analysis requests, or educational contexts without meaning 'run this skill now'. That ambiguity raises the risk of spurious invocation, which is especially relevant here because the skill may expand or rewrite queries automatically before search.
The phrase '多意图拆解' is too generic to uniquely signal invocation of this skill and could appear in unrelated prompt-engineering or product discussions. If auto-triggered, the skill could split user input into multiple searches, increasing tool usage and potentially broadening data exposure beyond the user's intended narrow request.
This markdown file is written entirely in Chinese and presents the skill behavior and rewrite patterns as fixed instructions, with no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, a skill that imposes a specific language without opt-in should be flagged unless the locale restriction is documented and justified.
The natural-language content is predominantly Chinese, while only a brief English summary is provided. This may amount to an implicit language preference without an explicit opt-in or statement that users may interact in their preferred language.
The trigger '反问改写' is somewhat underspecified and may activate on discussion of rhetoric or writing rather than a concrete request to rewrite a query for retrieval. The resulting risk is lower than broader triggers, but unintended rewrites can still distort workflow and cause unnecessary retrieval operations.
This manifest file includes user-facing natural-language content in Chinese in the changes list, with no indication that the skill is intended only for Chinese-speaking users or that alternate language support is available. That can violate language/locale policy expectations when a skill implicitly forces a specific language without user opt-in.
No suspicious patterns detected.