T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices
- Location
scripts/submit_happy_horse.sh:18- Finding
PoYo API Key Exposed Through Process Arguments
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
scripts/submit_happy_horse.sh, lines 18-20
Vulnerability Type: API credential exposure through command-line arguments
Risk Level: MediumVulnerable Code:
bash curl -sS https://api.poyo.ai/api/generate/submit \ -H "Authorization: Bearer ${POYO_API_KEY}" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \Technical Analysis
The shell expands
POYO_API_KEYbefore startingcurl, placing the complete authorization header in the process argument vector. Depending on operating-system process visibility and monitoring configuration, the bearer token may be exposed through process inspection interfaces, diagnostic utilities, audit logs, crash reports, or process-monitoring agents.The token is not hardcoded in the repository, and exploitation requires local process visibility or access to captured process metadata. However, this implementation conflicts with the documented requirement to treat the API key as a secret.
Attack Path
- An attacker obtains access to the same host or to a monitoring system that records process command lines.
- The attacker waits for a user or automation job to run
submit_happy_horse.sh. - While
curlis active, or from previously collected telemetry, the attacker reads its argument vector. - The attacker extracts the value following
Authorization: Bearer. - The attacker uses the stolen token to authenticate unauthorized requests to the PoYo API.
Impact Assessment
Successful exploitation discloses the privileges associated with the affected PoYo API key. The attacker could submit unauthorized generation jobs, consume account quota or funds, and access any API operations authorized for that credential. This issue does not itself grant local privilege escalation or arbitrary code execution; its scope is limited to the exposed API credential and the permissions assigned to it.
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Do not pass bearer tokens directly as command-line argument values.
- Supply the authorization header through a protected mechanism that does not expose the token in the process argument vector, such as a temporary curl configuration file with mode
0600. - Create temporary credential material with
mktemp, apply restrictive permissions before writing the secret, and install atrapto remove it on normal exit, errors, and signals. - Ensure process-monitoring and diagnostic systems do not retain authorization headers.
- Use narrowly scoped API credentials where supported and rotate the current key if process arguments may already have been collected.
- Avoid printing commands or enabling shell tracing while credentials are in scope.
