Back to skill

Security audit

Alphagbm Marks Cycle

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple market-cycle guidance skill with no executable code, persistence, credential use, or hidden local access, though users should treat its trading posture as informational rather than personalized financial advice.

Before installing, understand that this skill can return direct market posture suggestions such as buying aggressively, trimming, or using options protection. Use it as a market-sentiment framework, not as personalized financial advice or an instruction to trade automatically.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The trigger list is broad enough to match ordinary market-commentary requests, which can cause the skill to activate outside a clearly scoped user intent. In a financial skill, this increases the chance of unsolicited or overconfident trading-oriented guidance being injected into general conversations about markets.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
78% confidence
Finding

The documented output schema hardcodes both posture_zh and posture_en, which introduces language behavior without stating how user preference is selected or whether multilingual output is optional. Under the language/locale policy, language handling should be user-directed or clearly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.