Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a local Chinese-language IP annuity ledger checker that reads a user-provided file and runs bundled Node.js checks without network access or persistence.
Install only if Chinese-language output is acceptable and you are comfortable running a local Node script on copied IP ledger data. Treat results as a consistency check, not as legal advice, official deadline monitoring, fee validation, or proof that renewal obligations have been satisfied.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
This code file contains natural-language descriptions, guidance, and result text entirely in Chinese, including the documented contract and user advice strings. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a locale/language policy violation because the skill does not indicate any language selection mechanism or justified region-specific restriction.
The file’s user-facing documentation, usage, status messages, and examples are entirely in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is limited to a China-specific deployment context. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
The only natural-language content in this manifest-style JSON is a Chinese header and dataset, which imposes a specific language/locale on consumers of the skill output. Under the policy, locale-specific behavior should either offer user choice or clearly document and justify the constraint, neither of which is present here.
The comment says non-JSON input is handled as "纯文本材料(例如直接粘贴的合同全文)", which describes full contract text as an example. This conflicts with the surrounding manifest and code documentation that repeatedly define the intended material as IP ledger/table content with headers, not arbitrary contracts.