Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a local food-additive ledger checker with no evidence of network access, credential use, persistence, or destructive behavior, though its documentation has minor scope and language limitations.
Use this only for the disclosed local ledger checks, and independently verify food-safety or regulatory conclusions against the current GB 2760 standard and qualified review. Expect Chinese-language documentation and note that several advanced checks are explicitly listed as not run in this free version.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample # 先看样例
The skill uses 'env' capability that is not listed in its permissions. This may indicate deceptive intent or missing permission declarations.
The user-facing documentation from the main heading onward is entirely in Chinese, including usage instructions and warnings, while the skill metadata only provides an English description summary. There is no explicit statement that users may interact in other languages or select a preferred language, which can violate a language/locale policy requiring user choice or opt-in.
The OUT_OF_SCOPE text states the tool '只把台账里的使用量与台账里的限量值按比例复算', implying a narrow arithmetic/text cross-check scope. Yet the same out-of-scope block and nearby comments describe using a built-in category-allow whitelist to '点名', while the runtime never executes any whitelist-based '超范围使用' check in this file, creating active contradiction between documentation of intent and actual behavior.
The manifest description limits the free version to six checks such as ratio recomputation, limit-value inconsistency, label consistency, duplicate rows, totals review, and field/date validity. However, the code embeds a category-to-allowed-additive whitelist and carry-in-only rules intended for '超范围使用' determinations, which is a separate withheld/premium-style regulatory capability not disclosed as part of the free skill behavior.
The comment says non-JSON input will be treated as plain-text material such as '直接粘贴的合同全文', which contradicts the skill's stated purpose and the surrounding code/usage text that expects a 食品添加剂投料与使用台账. This is not just incomplete documentation: it actively describes a different document type than the skill is designed to process.